A
Article 4
Guest
A side thoughtI’m sure I will get flamed, but the current consensus at an academic level is that existing guidelines are overly generous, especially in children. The basic gist is that any blood lead level is harmful (but as I’ve said, we all die of something).
I would say that if you were trying to study the effects of ingesting game on BLLs, you would try to look for statistically significant increases in a population, not just whether those who consume game had levels requiring intervention.
I doubt I will die from lead poisoning lol - nor will many of us. I have learned a lot from this research and to me, the most urgent need around this is potentially children or fetus...adults maybe not so much unless you live someplace like Greenland or Norway or are packing in 100 ducks a year without being diligent about your butchering.
As far as statistical significance, I found this NEJM study talking about toxic levels in kids. If anyone wants to refute the NEJM then wow...there is nothing that will please them
Well designed, good P Values etc...not directly answering the OP question but maybe shedding a bit of light on the "what is truly toxic part)