Yukon Cornelius
WKR
I think I’ll be where you are eventually.Appreciate the clarification. Im the same way with testing gear. In this case specifically, I’ve experienced the exact failures Form has recreated with testing, and had great luck using scopes the “drop tests” recommend.
I don’t agree with him about everything, that’s for sure. He and I have had our fair share of back and forth on this forum, especially when it comes to caliber and bullet selection. I just appreciate that from what I’ve seen, he’s quite rigorous with his testing, and clearly tries to appeal to empirical evidence when discussing these topics. Some things are subjective, such as what type of wound cavity you’d like to see on your game animals. Some things aren’t subjective; I just about guarantee that if any of these guys arguing for Leupold had my old scope on their rifle, they’d be singing a different song.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He does try to test things the same. He does provide information.
And I’ll still call the leupold haters. The tikka lovers. And the 30 cal or larger only guys all part of a cult.
What I enjoy about these threads is more information to process. I think some of the naysayers over exaggerate their experience.
I think about that guy that shared the photos the other week of the elf-x bullet that didn’t penetrate or something. And he was crusified for now showing more pictures.
I like showing proof of any claim I make if I’m going to be serious but I don’t always get a chance to take pics.
The wound channel my daughter’s eld-x did to our moose was freaking eye opening. But I know of 4 guys that swear the bullet sucks and doesn’t perform. They have personal bal experience with it failing.
