Is it all Leopolds

[mxgsfmdpx]

But how would we know if some of them had loose scope rings, inconsistencies in their reloads, can’t call wind from one day to the next etc…?

You clearly haven’t fully read any of them or are misunderstanding the workflow with comments like this.

 

[JGRaider]

The mere mention of the word "Leupold" always provides entertaining/repetitive discussions. In reality this stuff really isn't that hard........

 

[Justin Crossley]

I have a mk4HD I did a quick review on the optics forum here. So far it’s doing fine. I’m going out Sunday to shoot some more and see how it’s doing. I’ll lean it against my truck and knock over into the rocks or something and see what happens.

Just shoot it at the target and record where the first shot hits. Then, next time you take it out, do the same thing. After just a few trips to shoot, you will have a good idea if you can trust the scope.

 

[freddyG]

I’m not hurt at all. You seem hurt that most people trust the choices of pro shooters and elite military units more than they trust the word of a couple random internet guys. The “tests” here are information, but the veracity of that info is unknown. I don’t doubt some have failed. But how would we know if some of them had loose scope rings, inconsistencies in their reloads, can’t call wind from one day to the next etc…?

Lol. I can tell you don’t get out much. I now trust my gear 100%. No need to check zero unless I switch ammo lots(which rarely happens because I buy in bulk).

I also don’t need to trust pro shooters or elite military units, because I shoot enough to know what works and what doesn’t. That’s how you know for sure, not reading the internet(although that helps in narrowing down what gear to use).

In the end everyone uses what they prefer, but I can guarantee you most aren’t that confident in their gear, or themselves. Otherwise threads like this would be very short.

 

[freddyG]

Here is an example of no company being immune to problems, and how other disciplines of shooters deal with it. Just like the drop tests here don’t lie, scope checkers don’t lie either.

You are being redirected...

Like I said, if you want positive results, leave the emotions at home.

 

[BBob]

scope checkers don’t lie either.

I have two, one for Davidson rails and one for Picatinny rails. I also have a couple of Davidson to Picatinny adapters so I can mix and match on top of the Davidson rail checker. I have a solid Nightforce that has been my base scope to test others by.

 

[Yukon Cornelius]

here is ultimate question. Those of you that decided to get rid of your leupolds. Did you sell them or give them away?

If you sold them, your integrity is gone.

 

[mxgsfmdpx]

here is ultimate question. Those of you that decided to get rid of your leupolds. Did you sell them or give them away?

If you sold them, your integrity is gone.

Had mine repaired under warranty and sold with the paperwork.

 

[AZ_Hunter]

Just shoot it at the target and record where the first shot hits. Then, next time you take it out, do the same thing. After just a few trips to shoot, you will have a good idea if you can trust the scope.

I did that right after the trip. It’s in my review.

Loaded up some more of the same loads today to shoot again tomorrow. The ride to and from my shooting spot is all off-road, not nice forest roads, shit hole torn up desert rocky roads.

Here is the review.

 

[Justin Crossley]

I did that right after the trip. It’s in my review.

Loaded up some more of the same loads today to shoot again tomorrow. The ride to and from my shooting spot is all off-road, not nice forest roads, shit hole torn up desert rocky roads.

Here is the review.

It looks to me like that scope is moving from shot to shot or the rifle/ammo combo is not great.

 

[AZ_Hunter]

It looks to me like that scope is moving from shot to shot or the rifle/ammo combo is not great.

I think it’s me so far, need to shoot higher round count groups. Keep in mind the size of that bulls eye, it’s like an inch…, actually less. That’s about as good as I can see at 10x at 100 yards anyway.

ETA: Sorry, your comment is funny to me. Yes the scope is moving, along with the rifle, and the dude shooting it… folding table with sandbags, sitting on a folding chair, on raw desert uneven ground, shooting a 7.5lb rifle… yes! It’s moving. All of it. Haha.

 

[Marbles]

here is ultimate question. Those of you that decided to get rid of your leupolds. Did you sell them or give them away?

If you sold them, your integrity is gone.

Amusing progression.

If true, then the inverse must also be true, the person who bought the scope has no integrity because they took advantage of someone falsely believing the products are flawed..... Now it is starting to sound like buying and selling are not compatible with integrity.

Hell, perhaps giving them away is also an integrity violation and destructive disposal is the only acceptable course. Though, now we might be abligated to pass laws against them too.

Are we at the bottom yet?

 

[Marbles]

I think it’s me so far, need to shoot higher round count groups. Keep in mind the size of that bulls eye, it’s like an inch…, actually less. That’s about as good as I can see at 10x at 100 yards anyway.

ETA: Sorry, your comment is funny to me. Yes the scope is moving, along with the rifle, and the dude shooting it… folding table with sandbags, sitting on a folding chair, on raw desert uneven ground, shooting a 7.5lb rifle… yes! It’s moving. All of it. Haha.

I agree, while there is no base group size provided, 1.5 MOA is probably about the precision that can be expected of most hunting rifles. I would say, no evidence of a shift.

The first one Form tested also held (at least while I was following that), so quite possible you got a good one. I was trying to find one available with illumination until the second and third both failed, then decided I did not want to hazard it.

 

[Stickmark]

I sold my leopold to a man who knew they were not the best. My integrity survives.
He wanted to place it on a M70, for a classical-look build. I took a buck with it previously, pretty much where I aimed if recalling correctly.
I wanted to get a more robust system for backpack hunts.

 

[JackButler]

Lol. I can tell you don’t get out much. I now trust my gear 100%. No need to check zero unless I switch ammo lots(which rarely happens because I buy in bulk).

I also don’t need to trust pro shooters or elite military units, because I shoot enough to know what works and what doesn’t. That’s how you know for sure, not reading the internet(although that helps in narrowing down what gear to use).

You’re the one trusting random internet guys. While I do put some credence to match results and decades of elite Military unit choices, that was my actual initial point. My real world experience has been that leupold scopes are able to retain zero.

In the end everyone uses what they prefer, but I can guarantee you most aren’t that confident in their gear, or themselves. Otherwise threads like this would be very short.

Well you’re wrong about how much I get out, so maybe you’re wrong about leupold scopes being unable to hold zero. I’m sure plenty of guys shoot way more than me, but I shoot at least a thousand rounds a year from 600-1200 yards, and many more at shorter distances. I killed a 370” elk unguided a month ago. So while I’m not a professional shooting 20k rounds a year, I also get out plenty in real world to know what works.

 

[JackButler]

Just shoot it at the target and record where the first shot hits. Then, next time you take it out, do the same thing. After just a few trips to shoot, you will have a good idea if you can trust the scope.

This is only part of the equation though. If it’s all over the place on subsequent trips, is there an issue with rings? Does the shooter not know how to read wind? Etc…
At a minimum you’d need to swap in a different scope, repeat the same tests, and if that one was spot on then put the old scope back on, and do the test again. If it wouldn’t hold zero again, then yeah looking like that scope has a problem. And that’s a sample size of one so it wouldn’t mean that brand of scope doesn’t hold zero and is junk across the board. It just means you have a bad scope.

 

[BBob]

here is ultimate question. Those of you that decided to get rid of your leupolds. Did you sell them or give them away?

If you sold them, your integrity is gone.

I took the time to send each and every failed Leupold back to them to repair/check for failure. I sold them when they came back with full disclosure that they went to Leupold for issues/suspected issues. No one batted an eye purchasing one. Is my integrity gone or is it still okay?

 

[35WhelenAI]

Lol, in general don't make ass hat, openly assumptive, holier than thou comments if a person doesn't want or like somebody to come back at them.

 

[Cannonball]

I sold my leopold to a man who knew they were not the best. My integrity survives.
He wanted to place it on a M70, for a classical-look build. I took a buck with it previously, pretty much where I aimed if recalling correctly.
I wanted to get a more robust system for backpack hunts.

My first gun is a M70 featherweight that has a vari-x II on it. My Dads M70 supergrade has a Vari-X III. Both sit in the safe and the Seekins or Tikka with Trijicons go out in the field, but I kinda want to take the M70s out and shoot them now .

 

[JackButler]

Amusing progression.

If true, then the inverse must also be true, the person who bought the scope has no integrity because they took advantage of someone falsely believing the products are flawed..... Now it is starting to sound like buying and selling are not compatible with integrity.

Hell, perhaps giving them away is also an integrity violation and destructive disposal is the only acceptable course. Though, now we might be abligated to pass laws against them too.

Are we at the bottom yet?

Your logic does make sense if you are telling people the scope won’t hold zero when you sell it. Maybe you did that, but I can’t imagine anyone would pay much for a scope that you advertise as not holding zero.