BigCountry49
WKR
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2018
- Messages
- 367
If a bullets energy and size don’t kill animals, then what does?No it’s the one that thinks knockdown power, ft lbs of energy and large bullet diameter is what kills things.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If a bullets energy and size don’t kill animals, then what does?No it’s the one that thinks knockdown power, ft lbs of energy and large bullet diameter is what kills things.
Bullet construction, and enough speed that the bullet performs correctly when an animal is struck by it in the vitals. It’s why a 77gr bullet at 1800fps will kill an elk, even though it falls well short of the 1500ftlbs of energy rule touted as gospel for so long. In fact, this .223 load has only about a third of that.If a bullets energy and size don’t kill animals, then what does?
Yea, I’m not stating the specific amount of energy required to kill different animals. But, in the end, it is literally energy from the bullet transferred to the animal that causes them to die. The debate is how much, and where the energy is dissipated.Bullet construction, and enough speed that the bullet performs correctly when an animal is struck by it in the vitals. It’s why a 77gr bullet at 1800fps will kill an elk, even though it falls well short of the 1500ftlbs of energy rule touted as gospel for so long. In fact, this .223 load has only about a third of that.
The size of the hole it makesIf a bullets energy and size don’t kill animals, then what does?
I don’t think being strongly opinionated and a bit obnoxious is a characteristic of any particular generation.
____________________
“Keep on keepin’ on…”
Sure, energy transfer does create the wound, but I would guess that the actual energy required is well under 500ftlbs even for an elk sized animal.Yea, I’m not stating the specific amount of energy required to kill different animals. But, in the end, it is literally energy from the bullet transferred to the animal that causes them to die. The debate is how much, and where the energy is dissipated.
Sure. I think the point is, with a modern properly constructed bullet, the amount is low enough that a 300wm is not needed. In fact a 223 will do the job fine out to 500 yards. If a guy wants to use more than that, or has the skills/need to extend that range significantly, then by all means he should go with a big magnum.Yea, I’m not stating the specific amount of energy required to kill different animals. But, in the end, it is literally energy from the bullet transferred to the animal that causes them to die. The debate is how much, and where the energy is dissipated.
Learned “a lot” from one or two bear kills? Interesting.Someone mentioned the Hornady and I thought about a video in which they are mentioned. Jim Shockley guided Jason and Steve Hornady on a bear hunt and during that time Jim said he learned a lot. Jim mentions that when he was younger he thought a .270 was good for moose. Now his mind is changed. The video is called BEST CALIBERS FOR MOOSE HUNTING.
Have you considered wearing a bandana to give your opinions more weight?Learned “a lot” from one or two bear kills? Interesting.
Have you shot elk sized game close to 500 yards with a .223? I’m genuinely curious.Sure. I think the point is, with a modern properly constructed bullet, the amount is low enough that a 300wm is not needed. In fact a 223 will do the job fine out to 500 yards. If a guy wants to use more than that, or has the skills/need to extend that range significantly, then by all means he should go with a big magnum.
Watch the video…he learned a lot from the Hornady’s. Dont assumeLearned “a lot” from one or two bear kills? Interesting.
Happily you at least recognize that this having different POVs and being unwilling to listen to different POVs isn't an age thing. But whats with the name calling? Does that make you feel like a big man? Perhaps superior? Perhaps you are so woefully unsuccesful in all other aspects of your life you need to lash out? What is it? Maybe we can help you work through your issues.Fudds come in all ages, sadly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Probably not a bad idea. I started balding at like 22.Have you considered wearing a bandana to give your opinions more weight?
275 is the longest personally. Worked as expected. Plenty of photographed evidence on this website of folks doing it well beyond that.Have you shot elk sized game close to 500 yards with a .223? I’m genuinely curious.