Possibly, but when Trump tried to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities and states when they refused to enforce federal immigration laws, judges ruled that he couldn't withhold that funding. So that shouldn't stop the states from ignoring the ESA, and they would still get their funding......as already declared now as precedent by the courts.
FWIW - "According to the court, managing wildlife on federal land was not a power reserved to the States under the Tenth Amendment. Rather, the Federal Government took that power under the auspices of the Constitution's Property Clause. Accordingly, the court held that the State of Wyoming "does not have the sovereign power to manage wildlife on Federal lands." Wyoming, 61 F.Supp.2d at 1216-17.