Idaho declines to give Colorado Wolves.

Mike 338

WKR
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
620
Location
Idaho
A little confused why anyone would want them. The fact is, they'll get them naturally wether they want them or not. There will always be someone who's eager to grab the headline for their 15 minutes.
 

Hnthrdr

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
2,657
Location
Co
A little confused why anyone would want them. The fact is, they'll get them naturally wether they want them or not. There will always be someone who's eager to grab the headline for their 15 minutes.
Politicians are seemingly all crooked and nuts, it will be interesting once we are long gone how some of them will be remembered. I imagine a lot of the current ones in Co will see Nero-esque
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
8,382
Minnesota's wolf population is far from endangered. It's been expanding for years.

yeah, well why dontcha tell that to the judges that kept them listed as endangered under the endangered species act mr smarty pants!

On serious note, i just wasn't sure if being currently listed impacted ability to donate MN's wolves to our fellow wackjobs in CO.
 

Dented

WKR
Joined
Jan 4, 2021
Messages
382
From a strictly hypothetical perspective, would it be illegal to trap wolves and then release them somewhere else in the same state? Let's say, for example, that someone traps 1 in the woods and releases it in the city...

The rural resident clears the area of an apex predator and the inner city environmental activist gets to enjoy the splendor of this magnificent animal eating its cat.

Just thinking out loud here is all...🤣
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
2,305
Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming have all made the right call not to support this lunacy. Unfortunately, the parks and wildlife are now negotiating with the Nez Perce tribe. This is according to an article I read recently. On the other hand, Wyoming is still chipping away at the North Park wolves on their side of the boarder.
 

Happy Antelope

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
1,043
Joined
Nov 4, 2019
Messages
360
From a strictly hypothetical perspective, would it be illegal to trap wolves and then release them somewhere else in the same state? Let's say, for example, that someone traps 1 in the woods and releases it in the city...

The rural resident clears the area of an apex predator and the inner city environmental activist gets to enjoy the splendor of this magnificent animal eating its cat.

Just thinking out loud here is all...🤣
That's a great question. Maybe the western slope should trap them and take them to Denver or Estes park. They want them right.
 

Hnthrdr

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
2,657
Location
Co

Blandry

WKR
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
475
Location
Colorado
Like they would know the difference.. 8 of those will probably die but it's for the environment
 

Stalker69

WKR
Joined
Apr 12, 2019
Messages
1,747
From a strictly hypothetical perspective, would it be illegal to trap wolves and then release them somewhere else in the same state? Let's say, for example, that someone traps 1 in the woods and releases it in the city...

The rural resident clears the area of an apex predator and the inner city environmental activist gets to enjoy the splendor of this magnificent animal eating its cat.

Just thinking out loud here is all...🤣
Great idea !
 

TEF73

FNG
Joined
May 28, 2022
Messages
21
Apex predators are the liberal dream until they end up in the suburbs. I am afraid wildlife populations will be desimated before corrective action for predator management becomes part of the mainstream discussion.
 
Top