Ice/snow comparison between rifles

Joined
Jun 12, 2019
Messages
1,679
It does a little bit. Not enough better for me to choose to use a 700 pattern action, but they do help a bit. True two stage triggers all help with debris as the first stage can help clear ice/dirt/sand.
I wonder how much better or worse the Huber two-stages I use would do for that. They're staged break, not true two-stage triggers. But they're also a lot more enclosed and better at keeping debris out since they're not user-adjustable. I'm not sure if those two things would cancel out or what.
 
OP
Formidilosus

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,119
I wonder how much better or worse the Huber two-stages I use would do for that. They're staged break, not true two-stage triggers. But they're also a lot more enclosed and better at keeping debris out since they're not user-adjustable. I'm not sure if those two things would cancel out or what.

It’s been a few years since I really used Hubers, but they didn’t do any better than any standard trigger. Them not being an actual two stage also is just silly.

It’s not really a “trigger” issue. That is the base disease isn’t going to be fixed with a new trigger. It’s the way a 700 pattern trigger interacts with the sear, etc. No one has been able to truly fix it with a new trigger. The answer is to move away from the R700 pattern.

Note: this isn’t me saying you can’t kill or use an R700. It’s simply that they are inherently less safe, with less margin for error, and more susceptible to failure with sand, dust, ice, snow, debris than other trigger/action designs.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
1,905
Location
Wasilla, Alaska
It does a little bit. Not enough better for me to choose to use a 700 pattern action, but they do help a bit. True two stage triggers all help with debris as the first stage can help clear ice/dirt/sand.
That’s interesting regarding the first stage. I prefer a single stage and have switched my Geissele Super 700 to such. I wonder if that would have any adverse effect in inclement weather. I’ll have to do some testing I guess.
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Messages
300
Location
NZ
My point is that the bolt and firing pin designs are pretty much the same between the two. So I dont see how one is significantly more prone to water infiltration than the other.

virtually zero condensation occurs in a confined space like a firing pin cavity compared to an exposed surface. Its not impossible of course. But again, both rifles would accumulate it to the same degree if it was happening at all.

The rifles have significant differences. The primary is that the Tikka is roughly based on the Sako TRG which was based on the original Tikka design. The bolt lugs are not flat, but angled and this reduces the chance of ice being wedged into the lug recess in my opinion vs. the 700. The smooth bolt prevents ice build up and dirt from entering the action. Fluting the bolt actually makes rifles much less reliable in my experience and is mainly cosmetic. Smooth bolts are much harder for ice to grip onto or for build-up to enter the action.

The Tikka trigger likewise has many attributes similar to the TRG/Sako with decades of refinement in very cold environments.

The Tikka also has a more enclosed action which boosts receiver strength and again helps keep weather out better than most 700 actions which are more open.

For firing pin sluggishness. This can be lube related. However when I've seen it usually it is the rear tang of the bolt where the firing pin protrudes allow ice to form and this is what causes the firing pin to hangup. My TRGs have done this, but usually the first is a light strike and the ice blows off. Then the rifle cocks and fires without issue.

I don't hunt in conditions like Finland, but if it will be cold I will actually keep my rifle outdoors overnight vs. taking into a warm hut. The warm to cold transition will almost always lead to water/ice buildup not just on the action, but the scope oculars as well. Better to keep the rifle cold if you are hunting in the cold the next day.

I too have seen failures of 700 actions in the cold where the TRG inspired actions/triggers just shrug it off. The findings here are exactly as I've seen.

Essentially, the Tikka is a direct descendant of the milspec TRG in many ways. The bolt has only two lugs vs. 3 on the TRG but they have many identical design features. Even parts like the Tikka inverted recoil lug is directly taken from the TRG design which also explains why they are so accurate out of the box. The TRG is just a really good rifle for accuracy and reliability.

For those interested, the Sako TRG was the Tikka M65A design taken forward. If you look at the rifle you can see the chassis and concepts are similar. Even had the famous two stage trigger. This rifle is, IMO, the grandfather of the TRG/Tikka T3:

 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 12, 2018
Messages
1,053
Location
Grand Junction
Through all this is sounds like Howas are a decent choice for someone who absolutely will not get a Tikka for whatever reason. Unless I’ve missed something.
 

Frank Dux

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 23, 2023
Messages
100
Kind of wish the MK12 was part of this test. Been admiring that one for a while. If you were building a new AR would you change anything from that one?
 

Marshfly

WKR
Joined
Sep 18, 2022
Messages
1,263
Location
Missoula, Montana
Through all this is sounds like Howas are a decent choice for someone who absolutely will not get a Tikka for whatever reason. Unless I’ve missed something.
I admittedly haven't hunted with it but I really like the one Howa 1500 that I own. I don't use it much since I bought the same caliber in a Tikka but every single time I handle it I think to myself how nice it is.
 

grfox92

WKR
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
2,760
Location
NW WY
Through all this is sounds like Howas are a decent choice for someone who absolutely will not get a Tikka for whatever reason. Unless I’ve missed something.
I think for what is currently on the market they are the runner up for an I expensive factory rifle.

Tikka followed by Howa or Browning X Bolt.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk
 

FCCDerek

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
172
Location
North Idaho
The downside of the Brownings is the lack of aftermarket support. If you're a tinkerer I'd stay away from Brownings. Plus, they tend to charge a lot for what you get, which I don't think is any nicer than a Tikka.
I think for what is currently on the market they are the runner up for an I expensive factory rifle.

Tikka followed by Howa or Browning X Bolt.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk
 

medvedyt

WKR
Joined
Aug 5, 2023
Messages
387
Location
whitehorse, YT
@Formidilosus thank you very much for the time spent on those tests.

i was one of those mocking the choice made by our army with the c19 for the rangers and after using a ctr for wolf hunting and other tikkas now i can say how wrong i was ... the main reason i avoided tikka here in the yukon was because 3 guys got an issue with the same model t3 300 win mag: they were not able to shoot in really cold conditions so i assumed it was the tool and not the users the issue ....

for bolt i moved completely to tikka and sold ruger and zastava ones and cant complaint and your tests plus the fact they are coming from a cold country similar to what we have plus the feedback from our rangers tell us.

thank you very much again.
 
Top