Some good info here:
I have seen bases TIG welded to the receiver. That ends the screw torque and movement argument.
I have seen bases TIG welded to the receiver. That ends the screw torque and movement argument.
What? You absolutely can tighten good 6-48 base screws to 20 in-lbs. There can’t be an across the board suggested torque because every company has different strength/quality screws. Hence why I said I use the included wrench until I feel it is about to strip or give.
And you know this because you have tried? There’s a couple dozen people from this board alone that have seen what I do to my rifles, and what they can do to them without losing zero.
Legitimate question- how is that you are so confident in beliefs that you haven’t tried, tested, or validated?
This guy comes here asking for proper torque specs to use to mount what he’s got and you guys go off the rails with some ridiculous shit to try to bomb proof a rifle. The guy has a sub $1000 rifle, glass, and mount combo, I highly doubt he’s looking for advice on how to be able to tow his rifle to the range or hunt spot bouncing down the road on a chain.
So how is it that taking a thing who’s sole purpose is to land a bullet in conjunction with a reticle, and making that as likely to happen as is possible is “ridiculous shit” to bomb proof a rifle?
Tell me logical reasons why I wouldn’t, or shouldn’t seek to remove as many variables as possible from the rifle system that I can? What does not removing potential sources of losing zero gain me? Why should I except less reliability and less resistance to accidents?
Because it’s in unreasonable expectation with certain equipment.
You gave the guy advice to overtighten his screws which is terrible advice. Then to buy a rifle with a built in rail which he probably isn’t going to do because you say so.
He asked what to torque his setup to.
I'm degreasing rail and receiver with acetone, applying Marine Tex epoxy w/ no release agent, snugging screws, letting epoxy cure, degreasing screws, then torqueing to 25 in/lb with blue Loctite.
@Formidilosus, how warm and fuzzy does that make you feel? On a scale of one to warm and fuzzy? Joking aside, I would like to hear your opinion on that procedure.
While I agree with certain things you’ve stated here and other places. I didnt catch him mentioning a screw size, in fact what I took from it is the sizes mentioned are not utilized based on experiences of failure. If you note how certain things are worded there is only experience by hand being shared. While you me or the next guy can disagree with an opinion or method, it doesn’t make it wrong if his results show otherwise. You and I both look for an exact spec as opposed to an opinion of feel by experience. Randy Selby demonstrates some of the same methodology as what Formidilosus is explaining. (As long as he doesn’t start to discuss the 7mm wapiti express) While I look for a number and exact process, he and others developed a mythology to apply where seen fit.You stated that 20-30in lbs isn’t enough. 30 in lbs exceeds the ratings on 6-48 screws. Yes they will take 20 in lbs and they will take the wet. You said that isn’t good enough. Go back and read your own post.
I’ve broken enough screws to know.
I'm degreasing rail and receiver with acetone, applying Marine Tex epoxy w/ no release agent, snugging screws, letting epoxy cure, degreasing screws, then torqueing to 25 in/lb with blue Loctite.
@Formidilosus, how warm and fuzzy does that make you feel? On a scale of one to warm and fuzzy? Joking aside, I would like to hear your opinion on that procedure.
Can I ask what ring caps are? Is this the top ring?
Integral/integrated same thing? Speaking for rails. Are there rifles where this is machined into the receiver?
Just planning for a future rifle and learn something here daily
Formidilosus’ advise is spot on.Because it’s in unreasonable expectation with certain equipment.
You gave the guy advice to overtighten his screws which is terrible advice. Then to buy a rifle with a built in rail which he probably isn’t going to do because you say so.
He asked what to torque his setup to.
You are on the right track. With your proposed rifle and system, and in the absence of an integral rail, it’s about the best you can do. This thread went unnecessarily sideways.I appreciate everyone’s insight. I’m not planning to abuse the rifle, but I am going to use the piss out of it, assuming it shoots well. It’ll ride in the truck a lot, probably get bumped around a fair bit, and might even get dropped. I don’t want to have to baby it, and I definitely don’t want anything to move.
I didn’t notice anyone suggest I should replace the rifle, but the point was made that an integral rail is a better solution…this seems to be born out by the back and forth of how fragile the rail screws (likely) are. So I’m going to basically do as @Antares outlined:
1. Degrease everything with brake cleaner.
2. Sand the top of the action and bottom of the rail; clean again.
3. JB Weld the rail to the action; blue Loctite those screws in, turn until snug then add 1/4 turn. No idea how much torque that’ll be, at this point I don’t think I care.
4. Attach rings to base; going to with blue Loctite here too, snug then add 1/4 turn.
5. Same as above for ring caps.
Only question I’ve got now, obviously I don’t want any release agent on the rail or action, but I’ll have to put those screws in while the epoxy cures. So I need release agent on the screws, right? I’m thinking this needs to be easy to clean off the screws and out of holes after epoxy cures, so I’m leaning toward cooking spray.
Just watched a YouTube video where the guy used playdoh; wax or doh, it’s a good point. Thanks!Apply release agent thoroughly on screws and inside screw holes. I like wax better, especially in the screw holes as it serves as a plug to keep errant epoxy out. The wax easily cleans up, especially with a little heat, and the screws will push most of it out. Cram a paper towel into the action to catch any excess spooge out the bottom of the receiver holes.