Closer to 190 to me.View attachment 1029600View attachment 1029601View attachment 1029602
Once the tape was brought out this guy ended up over 32” or 32 1/4” wide…
So you boys think he was closer to 190” or 200”???![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Closer to 190 to me.View attachment 1029600View attachment 1029601View attachment 1029602
Once the tape was brought out this guy ended up over 32” or 32 1/4” wide…
So you boys think he was closer to 190” or 200”???![]()
Dang he is a pretty buck… I’m gonna say closer to 200View attachment 1029600View attachment 1029601View attachment 1029602
Once the tape was brought out this guy ended up over 32” or 32 1/4” wide…
So you boys think he was closer to 190” or 200”???![]()
190 or 200 who cares awesome buck. Also pictures can be deceiving both ways some look smaller some look bigger. Just be grateful you harvested such a magnificent animal.View attachment 1029600View attachment 1029601View attachment 1029602
Once the tape was brought out this guy ended up over 32” or 32 1/4” wide…
So you boys think he was closer to 190” or 200”???![]()
If you remember rightThey're not. The velvet one is 198 7/8 and the other is 198 4/8 gross if I remember right. These are both really special deer and they still don't truly make it over 200. I am guilty of rounding up and sometimes saying they're right at 200. I don't think I'm the flagrant exaggerator the OP was pointing out though.