Yes, his genes don't change throughout his life.
Only a human can change its genes over its lifetime.
Sorry...I digress.
And guess where the word "gender" derives from...That’s gender
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Science has left the building.And guess where the word "gender" derives from...
Data has shown in both whitetail and mule deer that "antler genetics" are primarily related to in vitro and maternal condition. Kevin Monteith has a great study on whitetail in South Dakota. Whether you want to believe it or not, genetics play little role.
Generations of observations used to believe disease was caused by bad spirits until Louis Pasteur provided evidence for the Germ Theory of Disease.Huh, that doesn’t match generations of observations in the field.
I am not willing to say that all the 4x4s have been shot out of SE MT. I will say with SE MT terrain, MT's long rut season and plentiful doe tags, hunters can afford to be very selective with the bucks they want to shoot. The 4x4s are shot at a young age and the bucks that only have three points or less live longer. This is why we seeing more and more threes and big two points.However, places like S.E. MT there has to be something going on with the amount of pressure and everyone killing any 4x4 no matter size. There are copy and paste 3x3 and 3x4s all over that country but traditionally was not like that. I'd say a big swing to that prevalence in the last 10-15years
Generations of observations used to believe disease was caused by bad spirits until Louis Pasteur provided evidence for the Germ Theory of Disease.
You can believe whatever you want, doesn't mean you're right.
They directly tested the hypothesis of genetics vs nutrition. It turns out, once you are a generation removed (ie controlling the maternal condition) the genetics for antler growth between populations is functionally the same.I see you don’t even know how to interpret the study you posted, it has nothing to do with total point count, just overall antler size and body size based off winter conditions. They’re not mutually exclusive items.
Go get another booster shot.
There certainly could be a genetic bottleneck, but there could also be confirmation bias. Just like when you hunt a unit where you can't shoot spikes, you tend to take note of each spike whereas you may not in a unit where any buck/bull is legal. That is the problem with anecdotal data, it is rife with different statistical bias.The Book Cliffs in Utah went to a 4x4 or better hunt in the 1990s before closing down for several years. Now there are an abundance of 2x3 mature deer running around.
There certainly could be a genetic bottleneck, but there could also be confirmation bias. Just like when you hunt a unit where you can't shoot spikes, you tend to take note of each spike whereas you may not in a unit where any buck/bull is legal. That is the problem with anecdotal data, it is rife with different statistical bias.
I was making an example of confirmation bias.A spike is nearly always an immature animal. Watching a herd for a couple decades will show you which genetics are being expressed and which are missing.
You could reference the studies that show antler point restrictions don't do anything. "Cull breeders" aren't a thing.For example 4 points were finally killed on my buddies ranch this year after we killed most of the cull breeders off of it over the last 15 years.
This is not walking around an otc unit for a couple of years, this is the same piece of ground that his family has been on for 100+ years.
The steens is Oregon is similar, they instituted a 4 point minimum for several years, there’s a much higher selection of three points and giant forks there now as compared to other adjacent units.
States issue "management hunts" to increase opportunity.If it didn’t matter, states with trophy units wouldn’t institute management hunts.