Looking for thoughts between the zeiss conquest, Swarovski slc 15x56 or jumping the Maven B.5 18x56.
I am ok with springing for the Swaro 15x56 and I’m sure most will say get the Swaro but I am curious if the money difference is “worth it” for the Swaro or if the Zeiss are just as good. Plus it looks like you can pick up conquest on some sales or pretty good deals on used. Also wonder if the benefits of 18’s are worth trying the Maven.
I have the Maven b1 10x42’s and spent quite a bit of time with them and my dad’s SLC’s side by side. The Maven glass is great and hangs with the SLC to my eyes but they are not near as comfortable and I am constantly adjusting them and I sometimes regret not going with Swaro.
I am ok with springing for the Swaro 15x56 and I’m sure most will say get the Swaro but I am curious if the money difference is “worth it” for the Swaro or if the Zeiss are just as good. Plus it looks like you can pick up conquest on some sales or pretty good deals on used. Also wonder if the benefits of 18’s are worth trying the Maven.
I have the Maven b1 10x42’s and spent quite a bit of time with them and my dad’s SLC’s side by side. The Maven glass is great and hangs with the SLC to my eyes but they are not near as comfortable and I am constantly adjusting them and I sometimes regret not going with Swaro.
