Corner Crossing: Public Wins!

[Stubborn_bowhunter]

Just gonna leave this here...
Coming soon! Only $899.99

 

[S-3 ranch]

I’m classified as handicap, I wonder if a ADA lawsuit would stand to benefit that ADA assessable gates be put in place at the corners , bloody hell we have rights to public property also, in some states I am allowed to have a helper and use a vehicle where they are not allowed to regular people, just can’t shoot from the vehicle is the law
I can walk but no way can climb up a steep ladder, drives other hunters nuts seeing us drive past them when we hunt a NWR or state permit property, lol

 

[Billinsd]

Who will first to create software to identify corners and write what kind of game opportunities there are there? ONX? How many of you have already identified new places to hunt? How many are going to change their application strategies, because of this?

 

[ScreamingPotato]

How many are going to change their application strategies, because of this?

I wasn't planning to hunt antelope this year but I'm actually considering it now.

 

[mad_angler]

As for making ladders, here is one example.

 

[mad_angler]

Here is another idea. It is completely different and has me wondering if I could do something similar with logs...

 

[SM1]

I would like to know if and which states other than WY this will be legal in.
CO, ID, MT, NM, UT?

 

[WaltherDawg]

Looking forward to an ADA lawsuit to open those corners to be handicap accessible.

 

[elkhunter505]

I would like to know if and which states other than WY this will be legal in.
CO, ID, MT, NM, UT?

CO, KS, OK, WY, UT, and NM are the states this decision pertains to. Additionally, at this point the decision is likely limited to BLM land, but I think that these LOs would knee cap themselves if they try to sue someone doing this on another type of public land. There’s a lot of ways this could continue to play out. Maybe that LO will continue to be pissed off enough to push it up and then it would apply to everyone if it make it to the SCOTUS and they uphold that same ruling.

I think given this decision, it could be in the best interest of a National hunting association to use their resources to try and litigate past this point to include all states and all types of public land. But I don’t understand litigation. Seems like the argument would be that LOs are infringing on the public’s right to access their own land. If LOs say we are infringing on their private land rights, we can say they’re infringing on our public land rights.