Colorado Lead-Free Pilot Program

I have read studies where the actual isotopes that come from lead ammo are found in scavenging birds that are dead. A couple of them.
So what was the cause of death?
Did they find lead ammo isotopes in living scavenging birds? How much lead isotopes does it take to cause a negative health effect in a bird? How much to kill a bird? (I’ll take 1 1/8 oz of #6 shot, Alex).

If those points were not covered in the studies the studies were just more BS agenda-driven propaganda and of less value than nothing.
 
Every time I read or hear of these things it’s always about eagles, or buzzards, or hawks. And I honestly ask, what is so special about raptors that makes them the bird that everyone is so concerned about and obsessed with?
It’s like they are vital to continued human existence the way some people act. I’ve asked this question on another message board and had guys claim that anyone who would harm a ā€œraptorā€ is not fit for society and should be shot.

I’m not for eradicating any native animal in its native range. But I’m also even less for giving up rights because something might possibly, under just the right conditions, harm a few of a species.

Given the choice of ā€œmaking a differenceā€, I’d way rather do something that increases quail populations. I just can’t see why people get so emotional over some birds just because they have sharp claws. I just don’t understand the attachment.
 
The first thing we should be as hunters is conservationist. The link to using lead bullets and lead poisoning in raptors has been well established. In my opinion, it would be better for hunters to lead the way by choosing to use lead free ammo as a concerned conservationist who care about the entire ecosystem. As opposed to being mandated to do so by the state. This would show we as hunters care about the ecosystem that we interact with as well as take away the ammunition so to speak of anti- hunters harping on lead bullets. Who only get to enjoy the public lands because of our license fees and Pittman/Roberson funds from taxes on hunting and fishing equipment.

Here are a few links from a guy I know here in Montana who has done some great studies on lead bullets and raptors. He sends out a newsletter every few months if you’re interested in signing up to receive it.



Anyways, that’s my 2 cents.
 
I'm certainly not in favor of a ban on lead...

But the unfortunate reality is that regulations frequently drive innovation. Modern heavier than lead waterfowl loads and fuel injection/turbocharging come readily to mind.

I'm a little hypocritical saying this... But would us voluntarily buying copper bullets show that there's a market and drive manufacturers to find a way to make lead free bullets that outperform the stuff we think is killing great now?
 
When I read lead bullets are a God-given right it made me laugh out loud.

People complain about everything. If all the birds of prey or scavengers were gone the same people would complain there’s too many rodents and the department of wildlife should do something.

Operation normal. Carry on.

šŸ™‚
 
This is the generation of me, me, me, me, me. Conservation only matters if it benefits me. Me, me, me.

Sorry, but if a few slob hunters stayed home, so there are more owls, eagles and hawks I view that as a win. ā€œEagles are nothing more than seagulls?ā€ WTF.
 
In a conversation about non lead ammo it is worth looking at who is behind the movement. Where their funding comes from should be one of the first questions answered. The money and who is handing it out should answer a lot of questions.
 
When I read lead bullets are a God-given right it made me laugh out loud.

People complain about everything. If all the birds of prey or scavengers were gone the same people would complain there’s too many rodents and the department of wildlife should do something.

Operation normal. Carry on.

šŸ™‚
Look, if God didn't intend us to hunt with lead bullets, why did he create the lead bullet trees?
 
Quite a bit. Thousands of microfragments of lead are created every time a bullet moving over 2K FPS impacts an animal, and they are concentrated into a gut pile that enters the food chain through scavenging. Blood lead levels of scavenging birds have been proven to increase during hunting season. Using lead free ammo for big game hunting eliminates this issue.

That being said, these commie states like CO and CA mandating changes to the way we hunt is obviously a slippery slope. Honestly a tough situation though, because there is obviously an issue. If you have questions about switching, feel free to shoot me a PM- I've been shooting exclusively copper with great results for a decade
I had a couple of former employees that worked on the Beringia lead studies back in the day. The hard part about evaluating this study is that lead is that there are lots of sources for lead contamination in the environment. This study didn’t evaluate any of those. It was merely a correlative study that said there is lead here and lead here with the assumption that lead from the hunter kills was the source of lead in the raptors. It also didn’t really evaluate the effect size on the raptor populations. Not saying they are wrong, just saying that a paper like this results in more questions than answers and shouldn’t be taken as a reason to make overarching policy changes.
 
Just one more reason why I'm about to move out of this state.

Polis
Property tax raised
Housing prices high
Rent is astronomical
Small businesses closing at alarming rates
Homelessness out of control
Illegal immigrants out of control
Road condition in shambles
Road construction at a snails pace
Wolf failure that is $2 million over budget so far
Gun and ammunition tax raised
Ban on certain guns
All of the "Oppressed" alphabet people of infinite makes and models that want to groom the children
Let's not forget the Gay Games in 2030!!


Then in November there is a ballot to seek $1 billion dollars from the tax payers without raising taxes!!! Apparently it just comes from trees

This used to be a great place to live. But alas people wanted legal Marijuana which was the jump start of this bullshiiiit
 
Just one more reason why I'm about to move out of this state.

Polis
Property tax raised
Housing prices high
Rent is astronomical
Small businesses closing at alarming rates
Homelessness out of control
Illegal immigrants out of control
Road condition in shambles
Road construction at a snails pace
Wolf failure that is $2 million over budget so far
Gun and ammunition tax raised
Ban on certain guns
All of the "Oppressed" alphabet people of infinite makes and models that want to groom the children
Let's not forget the Gay Games in 2030!!


Then in November there is a ballot to seek $1 billion dollars from the tax payers without raising taxes!!! Apparently it just comes from trees

This used to be a great place to live. But alas people wanted legal Marijuana which was the jump start of this bullshiiiit
My sister lived in Colorado Springs for a decade from just before pot was made legal. It was cool at first, drew in some interesting people but those jerks voted the state Blue and made it so the cops did virtually nothing. She had her home burglarized, some guns were stolen plus some gold coins. Reported the crime and in 5 days they had caught the guy, had her guns but the gold? Who knows. The sticker they didn't hold the guy overnight. Took then 2 years to return her guns. She was never asked to go to court to identify her property so I guess he never went to court even. The jump start to the BS began when people started fleeing California for Colorado.
 
I had a couple of former employees that worked on the Beringia lead studies back in the day. The hard part about evaluating this study is that lead is that there are lots of sources for lead contamination in the environment. This study didn’t evaluate any of those. It was merely a correlative study that said there is lead here and lead here with the assumption that lead from the hunter kills was the source of lead in the raptors. It also didn’t really evaluate the effect size on the raptor populations. Not saying they are wrong, just saying that a paper like this results in more questions than answers and shouldn’t be taken as a reason to make overarching policy changes.

100% with ya. So many real world variables with a study like that it's easy to make conclusions sound more direct than they are.

What is pretty easy to see, though, is the writing on the wall for our sport at large. People have started to get really interested in hunting since COVID, specifically in understanding our perspective as outdoorsmen. It's clear to most people that lead does enter the food chain through bullets, and no matter what the real world fallout from that is, it seems like a really easy way for us to show the demographic that is reevaluating how they think about hunting that, hey, nobody cares about the resource like we do- which is why we do everything we can like shooting elad free to mitigate negative second order effects. It's really not very hard, and completely kneecaps the argument from the antis that we're a bunch of rednecks who don't understand ecology or care for the environment.
 
Last year I tried copper with my 6.5 creed. Learned a lesson from that. 6.5 and copper dont mix. It is too fast and at 80 yards i shot a buck a bit behind the sweet spot and it just stood there.
...
All three of my copper 6.5 creed went in and out of the buck the same size hole.
"Too fast" seems a bit odd. What projectile?
 
100% with ya. So many real world variables with a study like that it's easy to make conclusions sound more direct than they are.

What is pretty easy to see, though, is the writing on the wall for our sport at large. People have started to get really interested in hunting since COVID, specifically in understanding our perspective as outdoorsmen. It's clear to most people that lead does enter the food chain through bullets, and no matter what the real world fallout from that is, it seems like a really easy way for us to show the demographic that is reevaluating how they think about hunting that, hey, nobody cares about the resource like we do- which is why we do everything we can like shooting elad free to mitigate negative second order effects. It's really not very hard, and completely kneecaps the argument from the antis that we're a bunch of rednecks who don't understand ecology or care for the environment.

Or you can refuse to capitulate to unsound theories based on biased and poorly (kind way of saying it) formed conclusions.

Really we need to improve the general populations (and more importantly appointed board members) ability to evaluate studies design/merit and their conclusions rather than take on good faith that researchers are blindly forming hypothesis and presenting data w out bias.

If your research job/lively hood/phd depends on your study leading to further funding, might you portray your results (consciously or unconsciously) in a certain way?
 
Here is an example of where a study completely fails apart , yet the "conclusion" of a primary review article ignores a major fault in the study and instead proposes increased compliance with the presupposition of the study would lead to different outcomes.

"60% of successful Kaibab deer hunters took lead reduction actions during their hunt, an increase of 10% from 2005. Even with this level of partici- pation, 95% of the birds were exposed to lead (Par- ish et al. 2009, this volume). One factor that is likely contributing to this continued high exposure is that the condors are increasing their use of south- ern Utah habitats (Figure 2). To date Utah has not implemented any extensive outreach or programs for raising awareness on this issue, but are working on plans to do this in 2009."


Bonus for the readers, you can start to see where some of the funding for the studies is coming from....
 
Last year I tried copper with my 6.5 creed. Learned a lesson from that. 6.5 and copper dont mix. It is too fast and at 80 yards i shot a buck a bit behind the sweet spot and it just stood there. I took an additional shot and hit about 2 inches lower. The buck moved up the hill about 30 yards stopped and turned and looked back. Hit hit him again through the neck and he took off. Tracked him with my hunting partner and found him down next to a log. As we were about 10 yards from him he jumped up and took off my hunting buddy dropped him for good with a 300 win mag. All three of my copper 6.5 creed went in and out of the buck the same size hole.
What bullet/ammo? Too fast seems surprising for 6.5CM, they're usually not going all that fast to begin with compared to a lot of magnum cartridges.

Did you measure the exit hole? I took an elk with the 6.5CM and Barnes 127LRX, I thought the same thing when I saw the exit wound at first while skinning - that there was no expansion. Looked like a perfect pencil hole. Until I found the entry wound and could compare, it was still small but there was a clear difference. Probably expanded to around 150% caliber, so ~0.4" exit.
 
And I honestly ask, what is so special about raptors that makes them the bird that everyone is so concerned about and obsessed with?
They're just cool man. I like seeing golden eagles when I'm out in the sagebrush the same way I like seeing elk, songbirds, mountains. You don't need to join the Audubon society and go full bird nerd to check out a kestrel perched on a powerline by a wheatfield.
 
Back
Top