My wife plays a rokslide drinking game. Everytime she asks if I'm on rokslide and I say yes, she takes a drink. I'm worried about her liver.Ohh, or a RS drinking game.
Every time someone says "Not looking for any honey holes", take a drink.
45 day wait after criminal case was closed before any decision from IDFG, legal process is slow.
Three of my favorite things, jumbled, confusing, and messy. We have it.I don't want a consolidated thread. I like it all jumbled, confusing, and messy. Just like this ridiculous story-and it's knock offs.
Just think, you'll be able to tell your kids "i was there when rokslide blew up with memes and threads about an Insta hunter stealing a boal to gain credibility by taking advantage of poor decision making hunters who then created a bunch of drama and ghosted us with no details for months on end, creating a spiralling vortex of speculation, memes, videos, and a large increase to Robby and Ryan's bank account..."
Ah yes, the good old days....
My guess is a conjecal visit of sorts. When they were siezed and he had to identify them.Yes sir I saw it took IDFAG until 11/8/22 to return the BOAL to you. I will retract previous post if you like? Why was the picuture taken with the antlers in what seems the summer? It makes the timeline muddy.
My guess is a conjecal visit of sorts. When they were siezed and he had to identify them.
If I remember rite the officers hand remained on them the entire time. Some pics were angled to try crop him out?
Id meme but I've never meme before. I feel like I don't need more things in my life at this point.Uhh oh. Don't tempt him to bring a meme back out.
The conjecal visit part might have been too much for him.
Maybe make a redirect to the manscaping thread, that’ll really get people’s heads spinningMy wife plays a rokslide drinking game. Everytime she asks if I'm on rokslide and I say yes, she takes a drink. I'm worried about her liver.
To address your idea of the merged threads, it can be done. I think it makes more sense to keep them separate. Maybe we could just a link at the end of each thread for the next thread.
If I remember rite the officers hand remained on them the entire time. Some pics were angled to try crop him out?
So........it says that your arrow was determined lethal by the investigating officer. Even a gut shot is eventually lethal. He also says that a "second arrow" was shot into the animal "after" it died?????? How was that determined? Did he leave his arrow? And how could they tell if it was "after" the buck died?
Perhaps this is why the only charge was basically "wanton waste". Why on earth wouldn't the defendant completely break the deer down and haul it all out.......especially after seeing the OP's arrow in the deer? At that point he didn't have a leg to stand on. F&G would seize the buck either way. Still lots of questions and answers out there.
I know that "can" be determined, but in the field after the animal has been caped and some meat removed? Do F&G officers get that technical in the field?
Man, a lot of time, money, and effort for just a buck.......even a BOAL. I doubt I would go to that effort for even a "bull" of a lifetime (hiring lawyers, civil suits, etc).
I have been told, wound marks can be determined if pre or post from the way the blood vessels react. Like, where they have blood in them, and it's under pressure, versus post mortem.
Or something along those lines.
Not my area of expertise.
Brandyn was passing through town and offered me chance to see/identify antlers even though we still had legal going.Yes sir I saw it took IDFAG until 11/8/22 to return the BOAL to you. I will retract previous post if you like? Why was the picuture taken with the antlers in what seems the summer? It makes the timeline muddy.