My question was in context of the 95 nbt. Reason being I've never shot an animal past about 450yds., and honestly don't currently have the ability to shoot over that.
So if my shots on deer and elk are 95% under 300yds, is there any reason a person should go with say a 243 instead of a 223? The wounds look almost excessive at closer range with the 6mm stuff is why I ask... If I was shooting past 450 often, I would go for a 6mm 105+class bullet I think but that not my current reality.
I've read both the 223 and 6mm thread in their entirety.