.223 for bear, mountain goat, deer, elk, and moose.

Der Schwabe

FNG
Classified Approved
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
34
Location
Libertyville, IL
That's perfect. I already have the 105 VLD, but after seeing the results from the 108 ELD-M posted earlier in the thread, I'm tempted to try them. Thank you.
 

grfox92

WKR
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
2,769
Location
NW WY
The military chose that round for its ability to injure more than kill. Killing an enemy solder removes 1 from the field, maiming 1 solder take 2 solders off the field (1 injured and 1 to care for them).
What message are you trying to convey with this post?

Sent from my SM-G990U using Tapatalk
 

Drenalin

WKR
Joined
Nov 15, 2018
Messages
3,029
The military chose that round for its ability to injure more than kill. Killing an enemy solder removes 1 from the field, maiming 1 solder take 2 solders off the field (1 injured and 1 to care for them).
If there's any truth to this, they failed miserably based on the overwhelming evidence in this thread.
 

BjornF16

WKR
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
2,655
Location
Texas
The military chose that round for its ability to injure more than kill. Killing an enemy solder removes 1 from the field, maiming 1 solder take 2 solders off the field (1 injured and 1 to care for them).
Absolutely false...
 

Gorp2007

WKR
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
1,006
Location
Southern Nevada
Your assertion that the military "chose that round for its ability to injure more than kill" is absolutely false. That would be a violation of LOAC.

Not only is the assertion unsupported, but even if it could be proven, it would only apply to the M193 round. No one in this thread is advocating for the killing potential of a 55 gr FMJ.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
9,840
The military chose that round for its ability to injure more than kill. Killing an enemy solder removes 1 from the field, maiming 1 solder take 2 solders off the field (1 injured and 1 to care for them).

Buddy of mine sent me this clip recently. I immediately thought of this thread. DJ shipley probably has a good feel for reality on this.

 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,311
The military chose that round for its ability to injure more than kill. Killing an enemy solder removes 1 from the field, maiming 1 solder take 2 solders off the field (1 injured and 1 to care for them).

Completely and totally false. This is a nonsense myth that keeps getting repeated and has no basis in truth whatsoever.
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,311
187 pages of evidence and folks will still choose to believe an old wives tale that lacks evidence.

It’s not just that it lacks evidence- it’s completely false. 100% against US military doctrine, LOAC, and common sense. One of the metrics that the DOD used when selecting the 5.56 was something called “Stored Kills”. Meaning, in basic terms, the amount of “stored kills” in each magazine/combat load. With that metric the 5.56mm has more “stored kills” than 7.62x51mm.
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
674
Location
SE AZ
Buddy of mine sent me this clip recently. I immediately thought of this thread. DJ shipley probably has a good feel for reality on this.

That last line, followed by the shoulder shrug:

"My favorite round's a 5.56 70 grain, 77 grain. I love that, because, whatever you shoot with it dies after one round."
 

TxLite

WKR
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
2,015
Location
Texas
Fyi



31E6D1F4-1C30-4602-AE18-129FEAACAE0A.png
 
Top