$265 and $280 shippedOkay I’ll keep an eye out man. Do you mind me asking what you paid ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
$265 and $280 shippedOkay I’ll keep an eye out man. Do you mind me asking what you paid ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I asked this about Berger 156's, and Form (I believe) responded that the nose ring approach is a red herring, and not likely the reason DTACs can be effective (they tumble). They seemed to be studying the nose ring approach and weren't convinced it actually helped bullets open up on impact like advertised. I'm guessing the TMK's are still the best option.Has anyone here tried to nose ring a 77gr smk and shoot an animal with it? Seems like it would upset more consistently?
Just curious since there are so many cheap/accurate options with the 77gr smk, is it as simple as buying a nose ring tool and getting good and consistent performance on critters?
Thanks, I figured if it was something that was a good option, it would be in practice, I was just curious, mainly because the nose ringed dtac being a thing and smk’s not reliably upsettingI asked this about Berger 156's, and Form (I believe) responded that the nose ring approach is a red herring, and not likely the reason DTACs can be effective (they tumble). They seemed to be studying the nose ring approach and weren't convinced it actually helped bullets open up on impact like advertised. I'm guessing the TMK's are still the best option.
Maybe they'll correct me.
@Formidilosus @Ryan Avery
Has anyone here tried to nose ring a 77gr smk and shoot an animal with it? Seems like it would upset more consistently?
Just curious since there are so many cheap/accurate options with the 77gr smk, is it as simple as buying a nose ring tool and getting good and consistent performance on critters?
I asked this about Berger 156's, and Form (I believe) responded that the nose ring approach is a red herring, and not likely the reason DTACs can be effective (they tumble). They seemed to be studying the nose ring approach and weren't convinced it actually helped bullets open up on impact like advertised. I'm guessing the TMK's are still the best option.
Maybe they'll correct me.
@Formidilosus @Ryan Avery
Excellent, thanks for the replySo Nose Ringing does seem to help OTM’s or pointed OTM’s like some SMK’s upset earlier or more reliably. @eoperator has seen some indications in gel that NR Bergers have a shorter neck length than standard, but they also upset better in the beginning than SMK’s. A NR 77gr SMK would probably be fine, but will be more variable than a tipped bullet by far. The Nose Ring tool is also expensive. Between the 77gr SMK even with a NR, and the 73gr ELD-M- the 73gr ELD-M is a way easier, more available option.
In general unless there is a compelling reason to NR a bullet (6mm heavy projectile for instance), plastic tipped bullets are a better, more reliable option.
Just shoot the 223I have two Oryx tags next week. Private land guided so almost guaranteed within 200 yds...
Still nervous to try 223 for some reason. Might just go with the mighty 6.5 creed...
The D-18 has more than threading and a bolt handle.
The cart price for the blued .223 is $699 from Eurooptic. Less $75 rebate you're looking at $624.
D-18 add-ons:
$150 to thread (estimated)
$70 oversized bolt handle (DIY estimate at $50 plus tax and shipping)
$100 to flute
$150 muzzle brake
$125 cerakote
$595
$624+$595= $1,219
So $874 for the D-18 after rebate is a damn good deal to most I think. The .243 is 1:8 twist as well.
EDIT: also comes with a fluted bolt, so probably another $100 or so in savings over the standard blued model on sale at Europtic.
They are SSNo denying its a good deal and for someone who wants a 24" threaded barrel it's a great setup, especially having 5/8 threads. 24" is pretty long for suppressed though and then you're dealing with the fluting if you want to cut it shorter. Fluting, the bolt knob (compared to an $8 tourbon), a radial brake (would replace with side discharge if using a brake), fluted bolt (no benefit), cerakote, combined are less valuable to me than just having stainless. (I assume the bass pro models aren't ss?).
Long time lurker...time to add a data point.
First off I have followed the thread since the fist few posts and have read it in entirety a couple times over the last couple years. I update the thread daily during hunting season also.
I typically hunt ridge areas and fields in NWGA. Shots range from 10-400yds. I prefer to carry my 10.5" 300 Blackout suppressed SBR, 1-4 scope, with Barnes Tac-Tx as it is easy to carry, does not require ear pro and has never let me down. It has also has yet to require a tracking job more than 30yds. I am comfortable with a 250yd shot with this setup.
I am a AR15 hobbyist. I like the ergos, Im comfortable with one and I shoot them often from 10-300yds in various positions at my local rifle club. For all the reasons pointed out in this thread I gravitate towards 223/556 but I still hunt with my 300BO.
The new area I am hunting this year is so thick plus leaves have been late to fall that my Vortex 1-4 just isnt doing it.....I missed a couple doe opportunities recently. I did not have time to swap optics so I took my 10.5" red dot equipped 556 house gun with 73ELDs out on Christmas eve morning to get those does I missed the previous outing.
Well less than an hour in the 180lb +/- 7point we call Loki that Ive been watching on camera for 6 months comes in to about 40yds stopping in one of the very, very few shooting lanes available in this spot. In the 10sec transaction he took a 73 ELD in center of chest, turned with tail down and slowly trotted off. I felt like it was a good hit and thought I heard him crash down the North (steep) side hill out of sight. I waited an hour to get down.....alone with my thoughts.
Once I got down to find him I found ZERO blood or hair.....nothing. I was sick. Looked for 1.5hrs before calling in the dog and help. Dog found him in 5min, buried in a ravine head down 30yd from where he was hit. We drug him an hour out of the ridges to where a vehicle could access for the remaining haul.
We do gutless processing, were wore out and were in a hurry to say the least so no necropsy pics. Opening him up he was full of blood, I assume the heart was destroyed and pumping it into the chest cavity.
Soooo.....It work and worked well at killing a mature buck. Maybe better than my beloved barnes 110s. It did not leave any blood to track and in this area thats a problem without a good dog. I will try the 77TMK before our season is over
View attachment 651474View attachment 651475View attachment 651476View attachment 651477
I tried to search and yielded nothing. And since this thread has the most comprehensive collection of 223 data/experiences, has any on tried the Nosler 224 64gr Protected Point Bonded Solid Base?
View attachment 652279
Here's a thread that I found. https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt...414866/all/nosler-224-64-gr-solid-base-bondedI tried to search and yielded nothing. And since this thread has the most comprehensive collection of 223 data/experiences, has any on tried the Nosler 224 64gr Protected Point Bonded Solid Base?
View attachment 652279
I’m guessing these are the scimitar-horned variety in TX. Just remember that their vitals are further forward than the deer and elk you are used to shooting. Look it up before you hunt. Those critters have a reputation as being tough to kill, but it’s just because a normal shot in the crease ends up around the rear edge of the lungs. Hit ‘em in the pump and they die like everything else.I have two Oryx tags next week. Private land guided so almost guaranteed within 200 yds...
Still nervous to try 223 for some reason. Might just go with the mighty 6.5 creed...
Super cool buck! Well doneLong time lurker...time to add a data point.
First off I have followed the thread since the fist few posts and have read it in entirety a couple times over the last couple years. I update the thread daily during hunting season also.
I typically hunt ridge areas and fields in NWGA. Shots range from 10-400yds. I prefer to carry my 10.5" 300 Blackout suppressed SBR, 1-4 scope, with Barnes Tac-Tx as it is easy to carry, does not require ear pro and has never let me down. It has also has yet to require a tracking job more than 30yds. I am comfortable with a 250yd shot with this setup.
I am a AR15 hobbyist. I like the ergos, Im comfortable with one and I shoot them often from 10-300yds in various positions at my local rifle club. For all the reasons pointed out in this thread I gravitate towards 223/556 but I still hunt with my 300BO.
The new area I am hunting this year is so thick plus leaves have been late to fall that my Vortex 1-4 just isnt doing it.....I missed a couple doe opportunities recently. I did not have time to swap optics so I took my 10.5" red dot equipped 556 house gun with 73ELDs out on Christmas eve morning to get those does I missed the previous outing.
Well less than an hour in the 180lb +/- 7point we call Loki that Ive been watching on camera for 6 months comes in to about 40yds stopping in one of the very, very few shooting lanes available in this spot. In the 10sec transaction he took a 73 ELD in center of chest, turned with tail down and slowly trotted off. I felt like it was a good hit and thought I heard him crash down the North (steep) side hill out of sight. I waited an hour to get down.....alone with my thoughts.
Once I got down to find him I found ZERO blood or hair.....nothing. I was sick. Looked for 1.5hrs before calling in the dog and help. Dog found him in 5min, buried in a ravine head down 30yd from where he was hit. We drug him an hour out of the ridges to where a vehicle could access for the remaining haul.
We do gutless processing, were wore out and were in a hurry to say the least so no necropsy pics. Opening him up he was full of blood, I assume the heart was destroyed and pumping it into the chest cavity.
Soooo.....It work and worked well at killing a mature buck. Maybe better than my beloved barnes 110s. It did not leave any blood to track and in this area thats a problem without a good dog. I will try the 77TMK before our season is over
View attachment 651474View attachment 651475View attachment 651476View attachment 651477