.223 for bear, deer, elk and moose.

fwafwow

WKR
Joined
Apr 8, 2018
Messages
4,953
I’m all for shot placement argument. And don’t believe many of the old ft lb arguments that people use against smaller cartridges. What distance are you planning on being able to kill an elk at? They’re tough animals…
The answers are in this thread.
 
OP
P

PNWGATOR

WKR
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
2,641
Location
USA
I’m all for shot placement argument. And don’t believe many of the old ft lb arguments that people use against smaller cartridges. What distance are you planning on being able to kill an elk at? They’re tough animals…
Personally, I’d poke a 77 TMK into any big game animal inside of 450 yds.



That said, see post #2853…just sayin.
 

MEdude

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 12, 2023
Messages
113
None of those are going to fit into a Howa Mini magazine unless you load them with the ojive back into the neck. The only ELD-M’s that will load seated normally into a case and that magazine are the 73’s (and 52’s).
Does anyone know if setting up the Howa mini with the Oregunsmithing bottom metal, allows greater O.A.L.
And thus heavier heavies… Suppose I could call them….
 

Grundy53

WKR
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
699
Location
Washington State
77 TMK ammo back in stock.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
 

Jim1187

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
198
Location
New Brunswick, Canada
I did a thread search 👀 but no bueno!
Is the 52 grain ELD Match viable for deer inside say 150 yards? Looking to minimize recoil as much as possible for a 10 year old. He’s so thin he can get out of the rain by standing under a clothes line.
55 grain speer gold dot is a decent choice if hamstrung by twist or trying for your goal.
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
574
Location
SE AZ
77 TMK ammo back in stock.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Seeing powder spilled on their nice press always makes me feel better about running into similar issues myself.
 

Juan_ID

WKR
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
1,450
Location
Idaho
77 TMK ammo back in stock.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Code “welcome” gives you 5% off
 

FLS

WKR
Joined
May 11, 2019
Messages
743
Not exactly sure, I’ve shot a bunch of deer on nuisance permits with a lot of different rifles. Guesstimate is 15-20 with the SMKs. They either expand violently or pencil thru. Most worked fine and the deer piled up quickly. The ones that didn’t, the deer went a ways even after being hit in the vitals. I’ve shot 10 times that with 64 grain power points. They worked great. None ever went more than a few yards. Shot a few with 75 ELDMs and they work really well. Lots of damage and deer piled up quick. I shot a coyote with my 16” AR and a 77 smk last week at about 100 yds in the field beside my house. Shot was quartering to and he went down in a heap.
 
OP
P

PNWGATOR

WKR
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
2,641
Location
USA
Not exactly sure, I’ve shot a bunch of deer on nuisance permits with a lot of different rifles. Guesstimate is 15-20 with the SMKs. They either expand violently or pencil thru. Most worked fine and the deer piled up quickly. The ones that didn’t, the deer went a ways even after being hit in the vitals. I’ve shot 10 times that with 64 grain power points. They worked great. None ever went more than a few yards. Shot a few with 75 ELDMs and they work really well. Lots of damage and deer piled up quick. I shot a coyote with my 16” AR and a 77 smk last week at about 100 yds in the field beside my house. Shot was quartering to and he went down in a heap.
Totally understand the frustration with inconsistent wound channels!

I thought the 153 Atip was THE answer out of a 6.5. Not so much. Inconsistent just as you describe.

Bullets matter.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2020
Messages
498
Location
Idaho
IMO, worrying about meat loss is like worry about scoring a touchdown before you even catch the ball. When I shoot at an animal, I want it dead as quickly as possible, whether I'm trying to fill the freezer or kill a trophy. If that means using a bullet that creates larger wound channels at the expense of meat loss, that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make.

I shot the bull in my profile at 80 yards with a 175 grain Federal TA in .308. The shot was broadside at steep down angle, penetrating high side of near lung down through the full height of the far lung. He dropped to his front knees, stood back up, turned around, and walked about 50 yards before falling for good. I shot a second time just before he dropped, but we didn't find any more holes in him.

The impact velocity was roughly 2500FPS, and the controlled expansion bonded bullet exited and wasn't recovered. Obviously it did the job, but if a 168 grain TMK dropped him dead in his tracks, that would've been my preference. If I knew then what I know now...
I wouldn't over-think it too much, the Terminal Ascent bullet that you killed your bull with has been a good performer for us this past season... 6 youth hunters (ages 10-16) took 3 deer and 4 elk with the 200gr TA out of my suppressed havak element 300wm. All were one shot drops, 35 yards, 95 yards, 155 yards, 230 yards, 270 yards, 350 yards, 509 yards. (Total of 9 newbie hunters got their deer, but with my other rifles, 7mm-08 and 308win using hornady precision hunter eldx ammo). My elderly mother also took her elk at 430 yards with the same 200gr TA 300win rifle (also one shot, but the elk did go 25 yards before dropping). Most of the shots were either through both front shoulders or broadside double lungs.

I would not say that the 300wm pushing a 200gr bullet at 2850fps MV is absolutely necessary, as my kids and the other youth I have taken out over the years have successfully made one shot kills on deer with 243win, 6.5cm, 308win, and 7mm-08 rifles... However, this particular rifle is my favorite, as it is just fits me so well and is just darn accurate... so it wears my only suppressor... and inevitably all the kids wanted to shoot the rifle that had the suppressor on it. Honestly, the suppressor probably made as much of a difference as anything... because it allowed me and the shooter to focus more on the shot than fiddling with ear-pro.

I will add that I do not disagree with the premise that shooting light recoiling cartridges like the 223. 243, or 6.5 will inherently be easier to put more rounds on target than a heavier recoiling rifle... however, there are other factors as stake as well. For example, my young shooters shoot my seekins havak element style stock with a 300wm as well or better than my lighter recoiling rifles wearing traditional shorter style stocks. My 14 and 16 year old boys can easily make 1st round hits with that rifle out to 620 yards, but struggle with my less accurate 7mm-08. (But do as well or better with my tikka 6.5cm in an mdt chassis). It also makes a difference that I insist that my young hunters take fully supported shots every time, no running shots, and the shot profile has to be as ideal as possible. This means that inevitably every one of my hunters has had to pass on shots that many could likely make in their sleep... but it also means that we have an extremely high 1 shot kill rate, and almost never lose a wounded animal... regardless of bullet size, caliber, recoil, or even experience.

Anyway, I apologize for the ramble. Ive taken 3 deer with the "lowly" 223rem, out to 400 yards, earlier in my hunting career. Two were good shot placement and died quickly, one wasn't a great shot on my part, and took some tracking. And that was back when all I had to work with was 55gr soft points. I know my trusty tikka t3 1/8 twist 223rem (which I've had since before rokslide made them cool) loves the 73eldm... and my boys like taking headshots on jackrabbits out to 200 yards with it... haven't tried it on deer yet, but I wouldn't discount the possibility of it being a capable cartridge for big game with the right bullet.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 16, 2020
Messages
498
Location
Idaho
77 TMK ammo back in stock.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Yeah, I clicked on this... said it was in stock, added three boxes (max allowed??) to my cart... told me it would be $15 shipping... then applied the 5% off coupon code, add my CC info, then it told me my shipping was actually $19... but I proceeded anyway... hit submit... and it told me it was no longer in stock. How am I so unlucky that they happen to run out during the very 60 seconds I'm submitting my order??

So...this whole thread is purely academic for some of us... I'd love a chance to give the 77gr TMK a shot... but I'm just too unlucky to score bullets or loaded ammo.
I'm sure this thread has done wonders for sierra's bottom line.

Side note, has anyone else noticed that in the description of the 77gr tmk on sierrabullets.com, they recently highlighted the part about the bullets NOT being recommended for hunting applications... when I last looked at their site, probably only a few weeks ago, it was not highlighted then if i recall correctly... I wonder if this thread has something to do with that?
 

cod0396

FNG
Joined
Jun 22, 2019
Messages
48
The 62 grain fusion is, though I can't imagine there being much felt recoil difference between the lower grain options and 77gr tmk. I can't tell any difference anyways
Depends on the loading. Non MSR fusion is a light .223 load, so it has basically zero recoil. Factory 5.56 77gr TMK is noticeably harder kicking, in my experience. 5.56 77gr TMK loads will push the 77gr bullet to essentially identical velocities as the 62gr bullet in the .223 fusion load.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Messages
1,102
Not exactly sure, I’ve shot a bunch of deer on nuisance permits with a lot of different rifles. Guesstimate is 15-20 with the SMKs. They either expand violently or pencil thru. Most worked fine and the deer piled up quickly. The ones that didn’t, the deer went a ways even after being hit in the vitals. I’ve shot 10 times that with 64 grain power points. They worked great. None ever went more than a few yards. Shot a few with 75 ELDMs and they work really well. Lots of damage and deer piled up quick. I shot a coyote with my 16” AR and a 77 smk last week at about 100 yds in the field beside my house. Shot was quartering to and he went down in a heap.
From an ethical standpoint how do you justify experimenting on live animals when there a so many proven bullets available?
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Messages
1,102
How does a bullet become “proven” without testing it on game? Personally, I try to kill a handful of coyotes with a bullet before heading after deer. It at least gives an idea of expansion and penetration.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You kinda answered your own question. You did some testing. You did so on an animal that would quickly die, even if the bullet did not perform the way you wanted it to. Based on a good bit of reading, much of it of Form's writing, there are non-animal mediums into which bullets can be fired to get a VERY reliable indication of their on-game performance.
 
Top