RussDXT
WKR
Form, have you tried the Gen 6 Glocks?
Wondering if they are as good/better than the Gen 5’s.
Wondering if they are as good/better than the Gen 5’s.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not form but I have a gen 6 45 and have had gen 3-5 glocks, IMO, they are better yes... texture alone is worth the upgrade... having small hands, the slightly reduced trigger reach is also beneficial.Form, have you tried the Gen 6 Glocks?
Wondering if they are as good/better than the Gen 5’s.
Form, have you tried the Gen 6 Glocks?
Wondering if they are as good/better than the Gen 5’s.
Another question comparing CZ ergos and geometry to 1911. The CZs in general appear to have a noticeably lower bore axis, relative to the top of the grip beavertail. They also generally have a more undercut trigger guard. Seems like this would all help get a higher grip more in line with the recoil path (like a Rokstock). Assuming you had two platforms with same weight, length, ammo, no ports/comps, etc, would this not result in a flatter shooting gun?
Or are there other details in the geometry that more than make up for this difference?
Also, the grip angles look almost identical between CZ and 1911s.
For examples, for me right now:
Glock 19 or 17, Gen 3/4= 16 yards.
G19 or 17 gen 5 or M models= 25 yards.
Sig M18/17= 22-24 yards.
Tricked out Sig M18/17= 26-27 yards.
Staccato P= 32’ish yards
Springfield Pro/custom 1911 9mm that I’m currently carrying= 40+ yards.
I'm not sure I understand what this means ... but then, I'm not sure that I want to know, either ...When I touch thumb-tip to finger tips, I have less empty space than some girls I've dated, even though my hands are comparatively enormous to theirs.
They're almost like a Forgotten Weapons thing at this point, given how they've almost entirely vanished from these kinds of conversations, but where do Browning Hi-Powers stack up in all of this for you?
Hi-Powers don’t do well with heavy usage historically. The Novak built ones that places used in the 90’s were basically done at 30’ish thousand rounds. MAs for shootability- they’re good when they were built up.
I've never loved the Hi Power ergos. Kind of blocky and square like a Glock. And the balance is a little strange to me, maybe rear heavy? Or maybe the grip angle feels off? Not sure. Also the safety is too small. Could probably be fixed but it's nowhere near as useful as the 1911 safety.They're almost like a Forgotten Weapons thing at this point, given how they've almost entirely vanished from these kinds of conversations, but where do Browning Hi-Powers stack up in all of this for you?
Ah, that's super interesting. Didn't have any idea about their durability, but a Novak with a beavertail was a bit of a grail gun for me at one time. Good to know.
The new SA-35 4" from Springfield looks pretty sweet for a modern Hi-Power, especially for the price.
View attachment 1050204