110gr TTSX - 30/06 vs 270 Win?

Igloo

FNG
Joined
Jul 2, 2023
Messages
86
Would you guys have any real preference between these two, doing say 3300 FPS? Think the higher SD of the .277 version and more likelihood of an exit would be of any real difference?
 

S-3 ranch

WKR
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,150
Location
Texas / Hillcounrty
S.D imo is a important factor after speed
We shot a large mature buck last week with a 140gr tsx .270wsm and it punched a huge exit hole and granaded the heart & lungs
130-140gr Barnes is optimal imo
 

JFK

WKR
Joined
Sep 13, 2016
Messages
837
I’ve loaded the 110gr ttsx in 270 and it’s a great combo for sub 400 yards. I’ve killed deer, antelope and pigs with it. Muzzle velocity is right around 3350 in the load I have with h4350. I don’t think you’d see any real difference between 270 and an 30/06. The likelihood of an exit is near 100%.
 
OP
I

Igloo

FNG
Joined
Jul 2, 2023
Messages
86
I’ve loaded the 110gr ttsx in 270 and it’s a great combo for sub 400 yards. I’ve killed deer, antelope and pigs with it. Muzzle velocity is right around 3350 in the load I have with h4350. I don’t think you’d see any real difference between 270 and an 30/06. The likelihood of an exit is near 100%.
Cool, thank you!

If I go the 270 route, I'm going to try using Varget or IMR 4064 from Hornady data on their bullets, to look for 3300 FPS.

Was wondering if the shorter, fatter 30 cal 110gr might be a bit lacking in the penetration department, comparatively.
 

JFK

WKR
Joined
Sep 13, 2016
Messages
837
If you have H4350 I’d start there. Barnes has it as the suggested powder for that bullet in 270. Book COL at 57.5gr of H4350 is where I ended up.
 
OP
I

Igloo

FNG
Joined
Jul 2, 2023
Messages
86
If you have H4350 I’d start there. Barnes has it as the suggested powder for that bullet in 270. Book COL at 57.5gr of H4350 is where I ended up.
I do have some! If it works, it works. That's good to know.

Was hoping to get away with 51gr of the others for the same result but I'll be happy to try both. The 30-06 would be using Barnes RL10x data

Thanks for the info and suggestion. Considering the expanded diameter would be the same and theres plenty of shank behind it, not really looking to go any heavier in the 270. With a mono I am not convinced it does any good.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2021
Messages
1,644
This is right in my wheelhouse, exact loads and velocity you're talking about. I load the 110 TTSX in a 270 Winchester for one son, and the 130 TTSX in a 30-06 for the other son. Both have taken pronghorn and elk with those exact loads.

110 TTSX dead on the sternum of a trotting lead cow, heading straight at my son, 60 yards. She reared up, momentum carried her forward and snow plowed 3 feet in 24" of snow to a dead stop, literally. 3300 fps nominal MV. Found some holes exiting off to the side, which were probably the petals, never found the main bullet. RL19, extrapolated and worked up a load because I had some on hand I wanted to use.

130 TTSX broadside 90 yards cow elk, early morning at dawn. Scope fogged with his breath, had a hard time with sight picture. Hit high and broke the back at the neck juncture, dropped instantly. Finisher from standing back 5 yards or so. Exited into the dirt. 3300 fps nominal mv. IMR 4320, no longer available but still have a supply.

Do not need to go heavier, monos punch way above their weight. I shoot a 200 TTSX out of my 35 Whelen AI @2940 fps. It's a hammer on anything inside 400 yards from any angle.
 
Last edited:
OP
I

Igloo

FNG
Joined
Jul 2, 2023
Messages
86
This is right in my wheelhouse, exact loads and velocity you're talking about. I load the 110 TTSX in a 270 Winchester for one son, and the 130 TTSX in a 30-06 for the other son. Both have taken pronghorn and elk with those exact loads.

110 TTSX dead on the sternum of a trotting lead cow, heading straight at my son, 60 yards. She reared up, momentum carried her forward and snow plowed 3 feet in 24" of snow to a dead stop, literally. 3300 fps nominal MV. Found some holes exiting off to the side, which were probably the petals, never found the main bullet. RL19, extrapolated and worked up a load because I had some on hand I wanted to use.

130 TTSX broadside 90 yards cow elk, early morning at dawn. Scope fogged with his breath, had a hard time with sight picture.. Hit high and broke the back at the neck juncture, dropped instantly. Finisher from standing back 5 yards or so. Exited into the dirt. 3300 fps nominal mv. IMR 4320, no longer available but still have a supply.

Do not need to go heavier, monos punch way above their weight. I shoot a 200 TTSX out of my 35 Whelen AI @2940 fps. It's a hammer on anything inside 400 yards from any angle.
Thanks!!

I've read your posts on the 270. Part of what made me want to try this in the first place! That and shooting through some whitetails and seeing good holes made by the 6.5mm 100gr at similar speeds.

The 130gr 30-06 load is very interesting. Would be using 3031 for that one. But that 110 is interesting too.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2021
Messages
1,644
110 gr TTSX is getting on the light side for the .308 diameter in my opinion. Speaking from a sectional density standpoint, and it isn't as aerodynamic, sheds velocity pretty quick. Be good for deer out to whatever range it holds expansion velocity. On an elk, I would like more sectional density, as there comes a point in trying to get by with the least doesn't make sense to me.
 
Top