Dos Perros
WKR
Yea this is a marginal tax rate....in the 1950s, the top marginal tax rate in the US was 90% or so....
I guess that makes this a great deal then huh?
Yea this is a marginal tax rate....in the 1950s, the top marginal tax rate in the US was 90% or so....
And if you have an incredibly short-sighted view of the world where if something doesn't directly affect YOU it isn't important I can see how you would have that opinion.Did you read the article? This is a marginal tax rate that will affect almost zero people reading this thread. It’s factual, yes, but a bit misleading in the title.
It’s this type of media that creates divisiveness in our country.
No, it affects me. Let’s not get all bent out of shape over me pointing out a fact in the article. That’s all I was doing. We can put away the pitchforks.And if you have an incredibly short-sighted view of the world where if something doesn't directly affect YOU it isn't important I can see how you would have that opinion.
The top tax rate in this country has a downstream affect on everyone. Guess who pays the top tax rate? If you guessed "People who own and run large corporations that employ thousands of people" you win the prize!!!! Do you think these people will just put up with ever-increasing tax rates forever?
It should be helping.......all of these changes adversely affect our nation as a whole.......even if it doesn't immediately affect some individuals. So EVERYONE should be aware and understand how these things impact them and the nation in the long run. It's just like the gun debate......some folks say "well, banning AR-15's doesn't affect me". Really? Think again. ANY rights we give up as a nation affects the nation and eventually every individual. Folks will approve of a tax hike to others that doesn't appear to affect them (but eventually it will on its own), but then they'll scream when a tax hike is imposed on them. The problem is NOT "which individuals are affected". The problem is that our nation is detrimentally affected. People need to start understanding these things......or at least start caring more about our nation as a whole instead of "what's in it for me".Fair. That was an over generalization, but I think we can agree it’s not helping.
I don’t think anyone is approving of the tax hikes, and I’m sure that there are trickle down effects from those tax hikes, but not to the extent people think. My point was that the articles headline was misleading.It should be helping.......all of these changes adversely affect our nation as a whole.......even if it doesn't immediately affect some individuals. So EVERYONE should be aware and understand how these things impact them and the nation in the long run. It's just like the gun debate......some folks say "well, banning AR-15's doesn't affect me". Really? Think again. ANY rights we give up as a nation affects the nation and eventually every individual. Folks will approve of a tax hike to others that doesn't appear to affect them (but eventually it will on its own), but then they'll scream when a tax hike is imposed on them. The problem is NOT "which individuals are affected". The problem is that our nation is detrimentally affected. People need to start understanding these things......or at least start caring more about our nation as a whole instead of "what's in it for me".
Ok, we'll just ignore the fact that you keep repeating that this tax rate doesn't matter because it only affects the rich.No, it affects me. Let’s not get all bent out of shape over me pointing out a fact in the article. That’s all I was doing. We can put away the pitchforks.
The headline of the article is "Fair Share"? Here's Every State's Top Tax Rate Under Biden's Massive Spending Bill"...care to share what part of that is misleading?My point was that the articles headline was misleading.
Ok, we'll just ignore the fact that you keep repeating that this tax rate doesn't matter because it only affects the rich.
The headline of the article is "Fair Share"? Here's Every State's Top Tax Rate Under Biden's Massive Spending Bill"...care to share what part of that is misleading?
Then you haven't been paying attention. There's a whole movement out there for taxing the heck out of the "rich", when they already put ~80% into the federal coffers in this country.I don’t think anyone is approving of the tax hikes
It's fairly easy to look at that objectively......numbers and economics don't lie, people lie about the numbers and economics to obtain their agenda. And most people have no idea how these things work, and how it all affects them directly. It's just like putting specific minimum wages into law, instead of allowing the free market to dictate those. That affects EVERYONE adversely in the long run, and we're already seeing some of the affects from that.But we can agree to disagree on how a marginal tax rate impacts people differently. Tough to look at that objectively.
I was speaking more to the users here on Rokslide, reading this post. I’m very well aware of the call to increase taxes on the rich. And while I agree somewhat with that, it’s unfortunately not that easy. It’s not that we need to necessarily increase taxes, but maybe lessen the available loopholes.Then you haven't been paying attention. There's a whole movement out there for taxing the heck out of the "rich", when they already put 80% into the federal coffers in this country.
Interesting. Hadn’t heard about this. Do you have a source on that?Not sure how the gender studies money sent to pakistan turned out, but im sure its a thrilling report. That was only $100m or something.
Interesting. Hadn’t heard about this. Do you have a source on that?
How is this deceiving, it list top tax rates for each state. It clearly illustrates that the attack on “The Rich” is in full swing in this administration”Did you read the article? This is a marginal tax rate that will affect almost zero people reading this thread. It’s factual, yes, but a bit misleading in the title.
It’s this type of media that creates divisiveness in our country.
Taxing the “rich” more, especially to fund “social infrastructure”, aka socialist commie BS, is a terrible, terrible, asinine, horrid idea. Read my other post #32.
A much better idea is lowering tax rates, as Trump did. Its makes companies earn more and give more back to their employees or consumers, and allows them to grow. Bigger companies means more tax revenue without raising taxes. Amazingly simple.
Even better, less government spending…. More efficient use of our current taxes would be real nice too. Not sure how the gender studies money sent to pakistan turned out, but im sure its a thrilling report. That was only $100m or something. Wheres the other trillions they waste??