tdhanses
WKR
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
Guess we’ll see what happens in time, I’m not doing a thing but you are correct game and fish didn’t make the change the state did, I would think the class action if it happened would be against the state and state dept managing it.@tdhanses
Quoted directly from the WG&F analysis report - "A preference point system will ultimately guarantee an applicant a license."
Quoted from Brian Nesvik, Chief Game Warden - "Preference points were originally intended to provide hunters with predictability and reasonable assurance that over time, their chances of drawing high demand areas would increase. Specifically for nonresidents, they were intended to help hunters predict how often they would draw a tag for their favorite areas."
wapitibob said
"The max outlay for Moose points thru 2021 was $1,570, Sheep was $1,870"
First, the G&F Dept didn't change the system to 90/10. The TF recommended it to the legislature, who passed legislation. So I guess you can sue the State of Wyoming for your max outlay of point money.
Second, your points are still valid, if and when they change to bonus, you will get an equal amount compared to your current PP AND you get to square them!
Third, the second quote above says they were "intended", so you can throw that quote out.
@Rich M you've already asked me about DEA and you obviously don't believe what I said. On another forum Buzz said I was right. There will be no recommendation for 90/10 coming from the TF and without it, it's dead in the water.
Looking at those outlays for points reminds me of the thousands of dollars I've paid to other states and never received a tag and had them change the rules along the way. Really guys?
Just rough numbers but take an avg of wapitibobs numbers and times them by total participation, hence if anything happened it wouldn’t be one person, not material enough until you add in everyone.