wind gypsy
WKR
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014
- Messages
- 9,683
I guarantee some folks resist applying elsewhere because they already have money tied up in the WY draw. To what extent is debatable.
I'm in the process of talking with a Wyoming outfitter about 2020 elk. I figured Wyoming would be a good state to use an outfitter due to the wilderness laws. When he mentioned the draw being pushed back to May, my first question was did they push back the application deadline too? No (he didn't think so).
So now I have to pay him a $1900 deposit and give the state $700-$1300 in January. Only to wait in uncertainty until mid-May. The outfitter does have a policy for a full refund if cancelled by June 1st. But the more I think about the money and dates, the more I think it all sucks. I may be putting Wyoming elk back on the DIY list.
No, they will get the same number they always have...7,250 full price elk licenses and 16% of all LQ licenses.
Pretty simple, its in statute...
Not stupid. I've got enough points to draw in the regular draw. Applying as a group puts us in the uncertain zone for the special draw. I don't mind fronting the money, but some friends don't share that sentiment.Don’t pay a deposit. That’s stupid. Your chances of drawing without points are low.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Can’t remember if this thread was about complaining or the draw date, but a friend just sent this:
Alert: New 2020 Wyoming nonresident elk draw result date change
Big implications for 2020www.gohunt.com
But previously they were awarded more than their fair share of high value LQ tags due to being awarded prior to the biologists doing their work. Correct? Wasn't that the whole point of pushing for this change? To eliminate that disparity?
Not stupid. I've got enough points to draw in the regular draw. Applying as a group puts us in the uncertain zone for the special draw. I don't mind fronting the money, but some friends don't share that sentiment.
Yeah that's going to go both ways. Either not be able to float the funds to apply in other states, or not apply in wyo to be able to apply in others. Either way I doubt itll be significant enough to affect the odds.I guarantee some folks resist applying elsewhere because they already have money tied up in the WY draw. To what extent is debatable.
This whole argument about NR getting fewer LQ tags now vs over allocating previously can’t amount to many tags? I mean I’ve watched their allocations for years for their season and bag limits they don’t vary much. So I would think on any one yr this wouldn’t amount to but a few tags? And at the end of day, if we get fewer LQ tags then it’s made up for w general tags so to me this a mute point. My only issue is the Jan 31 deadline. There is no reason for it other than the WYOGA greed. I voiced my opinion on it when they had their comments period last yr. that’s about all I can doNo, by LAW the NR hunters are awarded 16% of LQ elk tags...not 15.9%, not 16.1% (with the exception of over-issuing due to a party application). They are also limited, again, by LAW to 7250 full price elk tags.
In some cases, NR hunters were not getting any LQ tags in new seasons approved by the commission in April. 100% of the those tags were going to residents.
The whole point of the change was to give biologists the time they needed to manage elk correctly, collect the pertinent data, allow the public process to happen, and allow the commission to correct anything to do with elk seasons, dates, license types, errors in regulation, etc. etc. PRIOR to anyone drawing a single tag.
IF NR hunters lose a few LQ permits that they were never entitled to by LAW, well, that's a good change as well...but a small, ancillary benefit.
Like I said, NR hunters will still get the exact same number of full price elk tags they always have...7250. If you don't like the change, fine, but quit trying to find a reason to pissed about it.
The change corrects the problems the early elk draw was creating, that was the "whole point".
Lots of places to hunt elk if you don't like the new way Wyoming Residents have decided to manage their drawing and elk.
This whole argument about NR getting fewer LQ tags now vs over allocating previously can’t amount to many tags? I mean I’ve watched their allocations for years for their season and bag limits they don’t vary much. So I would think on any one yr this wouldn’t amount to but a few tags? And at the end of day, if we get fewer LQ tags then it’s made up for w general tags so to me this a mute point. My only issue is the Jan 31 deadline. There is no reason for it other than the WYOGA greed. I voiced my opinion on it when they had their comments period last yr. that’s about all I can do
Yes I understand. But I wouldn’t have guessed it at that many. I would have guessed it at more like 20-30. That’s quite a few!Correct.
The discrepancy in tags was on the Resident side of the draw...we weren't getting 84% of the LQ tags required by statute. That resulted in a pretty significant amount of LQ tags not being issued to R hunters (around 300).
No doubt! I need more/new/better/richer/fitter... hunting friends. Lol. I've got some good ones.I'd be hunting alone or finding some new friends.
First sign of a bad hunt about to happen is when your "hunting friends" start to waffle...seen it.
It's crazy to me that people just bitch and complain both about things that are put in place to help them and people who are in the trenches on their behalf.
Don't apply if you don't want WY to hold your money for a few months and if you don't like the change, work to overturn it rather than complaining.