wind gypsy
WKR
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014
- Messages
- 9,954
Skimmed through 2 pages. Article is worthless without sharing the magnitude of how many less special applicants there were. Is that info out there?
Not completely worthless. Its kept us occupied for the last 5 days discussing the ruin of hunting as we know it.Skimmed through 2 pages. Article is worthless without sharing the magnitude of how many less special applicants there were. Is that info out there?
Skimmed through 2 pages. Article is worthless without sharing the magnitude of how many less special applicants there were. Is that info out there?
Is that a question for just western states or all states because I bet every single state in the countrys residents tags prices are alittle low.
Why?It was for Wyoming.
It was intentional clickbait. Worthless from an informational standpoint, absolutely. However it is accomplishing exactly what the author, and the Wyoming Game and Fish intended it to. The author is getting a ton of clicks and the WG&F is getting increased interest in the special for deer and antelope. For every guy on here complaining, there are 10 keeping their mouth shut and planning their $1200 antelope hunt. It seems like a crazy amount to spend until you consider guided hunts in easier to draw areas are twice that (or more).Skimmed through 2 pages. Article is worthless without sharing the magnitude of how many less special applicants there were. Is that info out there?
It was intentional clickbait. Worthless from an informational standpoint, absolutely. However it is accomplishing exactly what the author, and the Wyoming Game and Fish intended it to. The author is getting a ton of clicks and the WG&F is getting increased interest in the special for deer and antelope. For every guy on here complaining, there are 10 keeping their mouth shut and planning their $1200 antelope hunt. It seems like a crazy amount to spend until you consider guided hunts in easier to draw areas are twice that (or more).
Not completely worthless. Its kept us occupied for the last 5 days discussing the ruin of hunting as we know it.
I have not seen any numbers associated with the announced decline.
Some pretty good hunts you could do right now depending on your goals.I have 9 Antelope points i've been itching to burn and that thought absolutely crossed my mind.
Why?
You are arguing have resident tag prices increased with Inflation. Does inflation only effect wyoming tag prices or should it effect every state? your are missing the point. wyoming is not the only state that resident prices don't track with inflation . Which is what you are trying to implyWhy am I asking about Wyoming resident tag prices in a thread about Wyoming tags?
You are arguing have resident tag prices increased with Inflation. Does inflation only effect wyoming tag prices or should it effect every state? your are missing the point. wyoming is not the only state that resident prices don't track with inflation . Which is what you are trying to imply
I paid $35 I believe as a resident in 2000. It is $57 now so not quite double but they have increased significantly from a percentage standpoint.@Dos Perros I tried to Google it and can’t find what tags cost in 2003 for example. I’ll try to find an old one if I didn’t throw them away.
I know they’ve gone up but not sure at what percent related to NR.
Agree- to add I know several residents who were 100% against this. The average resident hunter knows this is just another form of outfitter welfare. The last thing the resident hunters want is more outfitters leasing up more ground.Outside of politicians I can’t think of a single resident I know that feels the NR prices should keep going up. It affects us to in that we have family and friends who don’t reside here that won’t come hunt anymore.
It’s been said but the residents didn’t ask for these price increases for points or for tags to NR. These weren’t items put to ballot.