Would you buy this scope?

[199p]

The scope is….




Fantastic with regards to reticle, eyebox, size, turrets, parralax- it is beyond what Ryan or I
18x
View attachment 1008223

I might have missed it but whats the lower bracket for? i like it, hopefully it becomes available downunder.

 

[alexnelon]

Probably not. We don’t cater to nitpickers. If someone has a problem with an eval that’s not continuously filmed, that’s their problem.

Also, the entire purpose of this project is to cater to nitpickers. So that's ironic.

 

[letrbuck]

Why is everyone so wrapped up in finding which company added this scope to their LOW contracts? Does it really matter??

What I really want to know, is when do we get to see @Formidilosus spike it in the dirt???

and since they're in hand.... lets see it sitting on top of a scale

 

[Schmo]

Also, the entire purpose of this project is to cater to nitpickers. So that's ironic.

No, its purpose is not to cater to nitpickers. Wanting an appropriate and optimized solution is not nitpicking. Demanding proof via continuous video just because someone won’t take someone else’s reputable word, that’s nitpicking.

 

[Schmo]

Why is everyone so wrapped up in finding which company added this scope to their LOW contracts? Does it really matter??

No, it doesn’t really matter. We’re just curious who actually wanted to help bring a product to market when almost every company has been unwilling to work with people on custom stuff.

 

[ElPollo]

No, it doesn’t really matter. We’re just curious who actually wanted to help bring a product to market when almost every company has been unwilling to work with people on custom stuff.

Kinda makes you want to support the folks who would take stuff like this on.

 

[Axlrod]

I think the drop tests should be filmed in one continuous, uncut video, with PNP of the target, and the target camera in view with the camera on the shooter.

Just to avoid any accusations.

Nah, still wouldn't stop you from making baseless accusations.

 

[alexnelon]

Nah, still wouldn't stop you from making baseless accusations.

It absolutely would. Accountability is the best shield against impropriety.

An entity/personality becoming "unquestionable" is the single most accurate predictor of future misconduct. That's called a cult.

 

[Axlrod]

It absolutely would. Accountability is the best shield against impropriety.

An entity/personality becoming "unquestionable" is the single most accurate predictor of future misconduct. That's called a cult.

So what?
I'm buying one on day one.
You are never buying one.
I'm in the cult, you are not.

 

[KHntr]

Under 25 oz?

I’m in for 1, to start.

 

[rafiki]

 

[atmat]

It absolutely would. Accountability is the best shield against impropriety.

An entity/personality becoming "unquestionable" is the single most accurate predictor of future misconduct. That's called a cult.

Bruh, take off the tin foil hat. No one is unquestionable here. It’s not a conspiracy.

If Form says the scope doesn’t lose zero, and then it does for those of us who buy it, that’ll come out.

Those that trust Form genrally do so because he’s been right about other scopes historically. I’ve owned several of the scopes that passed the drop test, and they all worked. I’ve owned several that didn’t pass the drop test, and they didn’t work.

No one is blindly trusting anyone. We’re all also validating for ourselves.

 

[9.3koolaid]

View attachment 1008611

Pepe Silvia is the scope OEM

 

[Scottyboy]

So what?
I'm buying one on day one.
You are never buying one.
I'm in the cult, you are not.

“I’m in the cult, you are not” needs to be printed on a t-shirt and included with every scope!

 

[The Guide]

Bruh, take off the tin foil hat. No one is unquestionable here. It’s not a conspiracy.

If Form says the scope doesn’t lose zero, and then it does for those of us who buy it, that’ll come out.

Those that trust Form genrally do so because he’s been right about other scopes historically. I’ve owned several of the scopes that passed the drop test, and they all worked. I’ve owned several that didn’t pass the drop test, and they didn’t work.

No one is blindly trusting anyone. We’re all also validating for ourselves.

Trust but validate then report your own findings. Those who have done this have found that what has been shown can be validated. I will still validate this new scope. Never go on blind faith but don't ignore the failures.

Jay

 

[43.6N]

We meme-ing yet?

 

[nm.otter]

“I’m in the cult, you are not” needs to be printed on a t-shirt and included with every scope!

Put the center portion of the reticle on the shirt with a simple "I'm in" below it.

 

[9.3koolaid]

We meme-ing yet?
View attachment 1008615

 

[Dobermann]

It absolutely would. Accountability is the best shield against impropriety.

An entity/personality becoming "unquestionable" is the single most accurate predictor of future misconduct. That's called a cult.

Actually, it's funny you say this.

I know you're new here, and I'm not going to type out the whole history of the drop testing, but the short version is:

• Form made claims about scopes not holding zero; people said he didn't have proof.
• Form gave examples of sample sizes seen, types of impacts and failures, etc; people said they wanted tests.
• Form did tests; people said they had too many variables.
• Form showed how variables were removed; people said they needed visual proof.
• Form provided photos; people said they wanted video.
• Form provided video; people said they wanted it uncut.
• Form provided uncut videos ... and people said they were too long, and perhaps he was doing his own test wrong.
• Form said "Don't believe me at all - do your own testing". Some did, and got same results, while others said no way were they testing their completely reliable scope ... and anyway, drop testing is silly.

In other words, we've seen all the arguments come and go here.

And the point we're up to is that people are about to be given a scope that works well for many hunting scenarios, and will be robust.

 

[Axlrod]