Would you buy this scope?

Actually a 4-8 with a flipper would be the shit... never need less than 4 and really never need more than 8 for this kind of optic. No need for anything in between.
I was just thinking of this.
Like elcans 1x & 4x flipper you mean?

Full disclosure I have never used one, and they may have drawbacks that aren't good for hunting scopes. Just sounds good on paper to me with zero research
 
I'm a FFP guy but gimme a SFP on a 2-8 unless going crazy and doing DFP.
As long as its a usable reticle from min to max I don't know why I'd not buy FFP for everything (exaggeration), never having to ever consider what magnification you are on for the holds to hold (pun intended) meaning all day long please. With the obvious caveat of being usable at min thru max as noted.
 
As long as its a usable reticle from min to max I don't know why I'd not buy FFP for everything (exaggeration), never having to ever consider what magnification you are on for the holds to hold (pun intended) meaning all day long please. With the obvious caveat of being usable at min thru max as noted.

I’m open to being persuaded based on actual reticle execution. I just don’t think it’d be too much of an issue with such a scope.
 
Pointing to the RS1.2 I think makes the point ... Maven listened to Form and Ryan about the need for a more functional reticle, and we got the SHR-MIL, which borrows a little from the THLR. Great.

But then they openly joked on podcasts about how they thought the drop testing was silly and made derogatory comments about Rokslide/rs in general. So - listen to what end users want, provide it, sell them like hotcakes, and then burn your market. It doesn't get much more clueless than that.
I was close to getting the RS 1.2 the weight is what is holding me back. I'll probably end up with the Credo if nothing else new comes out.
 
I really like the SWFA 3-15 that I have. I wish it had an illuminated dot it would be great. The mill quad reticle is pretty good until it gets tiny
 
I’m open to being persuaded based on actual reticle execution. I just don’t think it’d be too much of an issue with such a scope.
How so? If you're on 5 power vs 8 power the hashes are going to be notable different and not easy mental math. At close range the difference wouldn't manifest too much but further out it would. Whether you are on 8x for further out is entirely dependent on how forgiving the eyebox is and FOV. If those are solid then maybe you're on 8x but there is always the mental question of remembering if you are or aren't. FFP that question doesn't exist, the hash marks measure the same think all the time.
 
As long as its a usable reticle from min to max I don't know why I'd not buy FFP for everything (exaggeration), never having to ever consider what magnification you are on for the holds to hold (pun intended) meaning all day long please. With the obvious caveat of being usable at min thru max as noted.
I agree with this, as minimal as I would NEED FFP in 2-8, at the same time it wouldnt be hard to just make it a decent ffp reticle.
Several scopes have shown that
 
Back
Top