Marshfly
WKR
But can we not call it the RokScope. The fanboy crap is lame.
Leupy has crap reticles in general though.Is this a joke?
This exact list is what a lot of us ask for ALL the time. A Leupy Mark4 that works.
So, yes. Yes I would be a buyer and yes I would recommend it to everyone that would listen.
YesIf a 3-12x40’ish mil/mil scope was offered that was consistently reliable and durable, was tested heavily, had multiple reticles that were truly usable/visible from 3-12x, a good/great eyebox and DOF, low profile zero stop elevation and capped windage; and was under $1,500- would you buy it?
Exactly! The demand for the RS1.2 should tell you what you need to know. That and the fact that your thread blew up to three pages in no time.Cause the truth is, you already know our answer.
I was 30 yards from multiple cow moose the last week and got sight pictures on them in thick woods. Why does the scope need 3 power on the low end with a FFP reticle? The maven is perfectly useable and actually has better usability from 6-8 power for even a “charging brown bear”. Ask me how I know.
If the stadia is thicker then it could work on 3-4 power I suppose. Variable power scopes honestly cause more issues in most real hunting scenarios than they aid, generally speaking of course.
It sounds like you guys have already defined all the requirements and are looking to simply gauge potential interest is all, so I’ll shut up now.
If a scope existed as in the first post I would buy one and then likely slowly phase out my Mavens.
If the same scope was made in fixed 8x44 I would buy 10-12 scopes off the bat.
I’d be interested. Is 20 ounces a realistic weight? I don’t know the ins and outs but I am curious of how it could be accomplished.