mj23polaris
WKR
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2016
- Messages
- 780
He removed the part on his bio about working for Sitka
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Especially if it says “Environmental Lead-Sitka” right under his name.
I know what you mean and they are in a tough spot. Would you want to be fired by your employer for having a pro gun opinion? The door goes both ways.
Did he just get fired??? Sitka reference is GONE.
He is a representative of the company but he did not go there as a representative of Sitka.
Sitka is going to have to make a statement about this and I hope this guy is canned. All I am saying is that because someone in your organization has an opinion does not mean its a representation of the organization.
Wonder what BHA will do I always suspected they were quasi anti 2A
While you're right he does have a 1st amendment right, that only applies to prosecution. A company can/should take action if a rogue employee goes against the grain of their foundation. I tell my employees all the time they represent us at and off work...act accordingly. In 2018 it's tough for people to take ownership for their actions. If the NRA had an employee making a video like this I suspect, despite no legal ramifications, they wouldn't be employed long even if on their own time.
I don't neccessarily hope he gets canned. I do know if his employer doesn't do anything then the statement has been made. If he is discharged then we know where they stand also...
good discussion though.
I agree with you. I am mostly making my comment to those that are acting like he went there and did this because Sitka told him to, therefore making Sitka an anti second amendment company.
He removed the part on his bio about working for Sitka
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
I agree with you. I am mostly making my comment to those that are acting like he went there and did this because Sitka told him to, therefore making Sitka an anti second amendment company.
Why would they do anything? If they are anti 2nd they sure have and give away a bunch of guns at the rendezvous each year, I've got one of them at my house even.
[email protected] if you would like to inquire with Sitka directly about their representative’s actions.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Still waiting for Newberg or Jacobson or the other Sitka ambassadors to speak up or do they all agree with what was posted. The post was bad enough but having that douche nozzle that helped get a hunt cancelled was the ultimate slap in the face to hunters and gun owners
Still waiting for Newberg or Jacobson or the other Sitka ambassadors to speak up or do they all agree with what was posted. The post was bad enough but having that douche nozzle that helped get a hunt cancelled was the ultimate slap in the face to hunters and gun owners