Who Hunts Using Suppressed Guns?

[streamerfish]

I don't own one. I see the benefits. But everything costs money, and Lets see....$750 gun, $350 scope, another $900 for scope coming this fall, $400 stock, base and rings...reloading supplies....etc, etc,etc, etc,...Lord.....

Not in the cards anytime soon. Unless there is a lightweight, short, effective one out there for a couple hundred bucks.

 

[Oregon]

First and only time was the rental .300wm I used in Africa.
I feel in love!! Only time in my life I heard the bullet impact animals I was shooting at. Plus the visual of watching bullet impact through scope. Game changer. Never had that happen with my own .300.
I want to get one for my 2 main hunting rifles. Browning A bolt 300wm and 338 ruger.
I’m so tight I can’t crap a greased BB, so I doubt I’ll spend the money.

 

[WRO]

I have 4, soon to be 5. I won’t shoot a gun without one. All my guns except one have 20” or shorter barrels. My girls love their quiet guns.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Ross]

Not needed here, extra weight and length. Would not have yielded any better results, so see no need.

 

[omicron1792]

Not needed here, extra weight and length. Would not have yielded any better results, so see no need.

Can you speak up. I can’t hear you.

 

[Ross]

Hearing rivals a 20 yr old

 

[cnelk]

No suppressor(s) here
My classic rifles are fine without them.

Although I do see/hear the benefit

 

[ArgentJ]

Always, I'm trying to preserve my hearing for as long as possible. I almost always shoot suppressed even when target shooting.