What is wrong with ruger rifles

[TNHighlands]

I dislike the factory trigger of my new Ruger American Ranch gen 2 5.56 rifle and expect my Timney trigger to arrive to my mailbox today. Timney factory set the trigger at 2 pounds.

You'll be thrilled. It's night and day.

 

[sneaky]

They're running $600+

Why anyone would pick one over a Howa/Tikka/Sauer at that price is beyond me.

Because Howa actions feel like trash, and until Tikka decided to join this century and offer threaded barrels, you could get an RAR with cerakote, fluted barrel, and threaded, for a couple hundred less than a Tikka. I haven't paid $600 for any of the RAR rifles I've bought, usually a lot less than that. Tikka has a great action, and a ton of aftermarket support, but they don't really shoot any better than the RARs. Sub MOA from both is sub MOA. For someone on a budget, they are a good option.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

 

[sneaky]

Thats more than a tikka! Granted you'd have to get the thing threaded but still...

A Tikka that's cerakoted, fluted, and threaded? Not hardly lol. You can also get more caliber options in the RAR. Hell, the first thing most people who buy Tikkas do is change barrels, and stocks. That puts you way above the RAR. Where's the 22CM, 6CM, 6ARC, and 22ARC factory Tikkas? The 6CM won't be around till later this year, the other ones probably in the 2030s the way Tikka operates

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

 

[ProRoad]

I put a Timney trigger upgrade (2.5 pounds) in my Ruger American Gen 2. 7.08 this weekend and proceeded to shoot the tightest groups I have ever shot while doing some handload testing. I have now decided to keep the factory stock and go with a Salmon River Solutions Arca rail. This rifle is now much less of a regret and I look forward to hunting Coyotes to Elk.

 

[BLJ]

I have now decided to keep the factory stock and go with a Salmon River Solutions Arca rail.

You can get ARCA rails off of Amazon for cheap.

It would match the factory stock better.

 

[ProRoad]

I looked on Amazon but no luck, they all had too much structure such as M-lok slots that would interfere with the convex nature of the stock. The SRS rail is made with a concave slot and the pre drilled internal holes on the RA gen 2. I chose the 9 inch rail.
https://www.salmonriversolutions.com/product/ruger-american-gen-ii-arca/

There is one other rail which is quite beautiful but too short for my liking. https://www.buffstuffsd.com/products/ruger-american-gen-2-arca-rail

 

[z987k]

Because Howa actions feel like trash, and until Tikka decided to join this century and offer threaded barrels, you could get an RAR with cerakote, fluted barrel, and threaded, for a couple hundred less than a Tikka. I haven't paid $600 for any of the RAR rifles I've bought, usually a lot less than that. Tikka has a great action, and a ton of aftermarket support, but they don't really shoot any better than the RARs. Sub MOA from both is sub MOA. For someone on a budget, they are a good option.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

Have you had many failure to feed problems with the Ruger? I've seen some videos recently that show a few people having trouble with them operating a)smooth at all and b) not feeding from the magazine well.
It might just be some recent issues with QC.

I agree an all fronts, the ruger is a lot cheaper by the time you get the tikke threaded and in the chambering you want, though I'd argue you need to replace the stock and trigger on the rugger asap like you probably will replace the stock and barrel on the tikka(if you want one of the many chamberings in the RAR not in the tikka).

 

[Old Hickory 45]

My Timney trigger arrived today for my Ruger American Ranch gen 2 5.56 rifle . Timney factory set the trigger on 2 pounds and my rifle will be wearing the new trigger tomorrow. Then a good tryout session is in order. In the trigger box was also a Tootsie Roll sucker and must be an apology for messing up my first order and the delays, lol.

 

[Cherokeeguide]

What is wrong with a ruger American gen 2

Putting lipstick on a pig doesn't stop it from being a pig. Applying Gen-2 lipstick to the Ruger American doesn't stop it from being the bargain-bin bolt action rifle that the "RAR" was meant to be. The lipstick does drive up the price, though.

The action runs with a gritty, unrefined, unfinished feel. The trigger is creepy enough to star in a horror show. The cheap Tupperware stock of the Gen-1 has been replaced by another cheap Tupperware stock. Color me unimpressed. I wouldn't buy one for my kids because I wouldn't want one myself. Like me, they'd rather have an AR-15.

Lop gets pretty short which is nice for my 7 year old

The LOP on the DPMS Oracle I bought for my daughter got pretty short, too, which was nice for my kids when they were 7 years old, but so was the gas-operated, semi-auto action, coupled with the already mild-mannered 5.56 NATO cartridge.

6.5prc

I have yet to meet a 7 year old kid who would rather shoot a 6 - 6.5 pound bolt-action rifle with .270 Winchester recoil instead of an AR-15 "optics-ready carbine" in 5.56 NATO.


So far, we're saddling a kid with what is, in essence, a bargain-bin bolt action rifle with a less than stellar trigger. In order to suck even more joy out of the shooting experience, we're also getting it in a cartridge with recoil on par with a .270 Winchester. Finally, to insure the non-success of this endeavor, we have this:

low end scope

I have visions of some obscure brand sold on Amazon for $35.00 to $40.00. The phrase "low end scope" has me thinking "poor quality" these days, rather than "low price." Hawke scopes don't cost much, but they tend to be usable, reasonably rugged, and reliable, without costing a lot. I've got a Weaver 2-7 x 32 that didn't cost a lot, but is slightly better optically than the Leupold Vari-X II c's that I used to use.

Also its pretty low in weight.

Which is an excellent reason to buy it chambered into something a 7 year old kid is going to want to shoot instead of what Dad thinks is the coolest thing.

Only deer, antelope and bears will fall to this gun.

I filled 21 mule deer tags, 3 pronghorn tags, 2 caribou tags, and 1 bull elk tag with the pipsqueak .250 Savage loaded to SAAMI pressure, and I couldn't count the number of California Central Coast swine I piled up wit it. Out of my Ruger M77RL Ultralight, which came with a 20" barrel, my .250 Savage ammo had the same terminal ballistic performance that I can duplicate (70 grain Barnes X) or exceed ( 77 grain Sierra Match King or Tipped Match King) with the 5.56 NATO today. You might WANT a 6.5 PRC, but you don't need one to cleanly kill the animals listed.

500 yards or less.

Hopefully less. Much less. Why? Because you also wrote this:

The gun will not be used for plinking too much, but it will happen some.

If you're buy a rifle for a 7 year old kid with the idea that he or she won't be shooting it much, you're buying the wrong rifle. I think you know that, yet your original post reads like it was written by someone seeking validation for a choice already made than someone seeking to make the very best possible choice.

My thought process on the 6.5 prc over 6mm is I’m old school and always think heavier is better.

"Old school" is me whacking mule deer with a c.1912 .250-3000 Savage instead of a more powerful .243 Winchester. I think YOU want a 6.5 PRC and you're using a 7 year old kid as an excuse to buy one. If you REALLY "always think heavier is better," then why aren't you shooting a .338 Winchester Magnum or .340 Weatherby instead of a .300 Winchester Magnum? A .375 Holland and Holland can have a 0-300 trajectory substantively similar to the .30-'06 and you never have to worry about whether you have enough gun with that cartridge.

Your thought process has nothing to do with that best suits a 7 year old kid. If your kid is going to be successful in the field, you need to ditch the idea of expecting a kid with little to no off-season practice with a rifle having the same felt recoil of a .270 Winchester is going to make clean, killing shots out to the 500 yard line.

I was a licensed guide (#2725) in California. I guided pig hunters in the Central Coast region. REGARDLESS OF AGE, the clients who shot the best in the field were those who were users of firearms, rather than mere owners; people who shot a rifle they were comfortable shooting during extended range sessions. I'd rather hunt with a kid who spent a year sending thousands of bullets from a 6mm TCU out of the barrel of a T/C Contender Carbine than a 7 year old armed with a 6.5 PRC he or she only shot a handful of times and didn't enjoy shooting.

Also, we are constantly in wind and hoping to lessen the effect of the wind, even if a tiny little bit.

The wind blows at Camp Perry near Port Clinton, Ohio when the National Matches are held there. A high master shooting CMP Service Rifle can score 200/200 during the slow-fire prone phase of the course of fire. He or she can do that with the 5.56 NATO at 600 yards on a target with a 36" aiming black and a 12" 10 -ring.

And he or she can do that because bullet diameter and weight doesn't mitigate wind drift. Ballistic Coefficient and flight time do.

And he or she can do that because he or she gets lots of practice shooting 600 yard prone between matches.

"The kids are pretty tough. The gun will not be used for plinking too much, but it will happen some."

No 7-year old kid is "tough." No 7 year old kid comes out of the womb with the ability to whack a pronghorn at 500 yards, either. If your 7 year old is so damn tough, why not let him or her plink away with the 6.5 PRC you've got your heart set on? I'll take a wild-ass guess and say it is because you know that kid really isn't tough enough to handle an extended range session with it.

 

[Shortschaf]

Putting lipstick on a pig doesn't stop it from being a pig. Applying Gen-2 lipstick to the Ruger American doesn't stop it from being the bargain-bin bolt action rifle that the "RAR" was meant to be. The lipstick does drive up the price, though.

The action runs with a gritty, unrefined, unfinished feel. The trigger is creepy enough to star in a horror show. The cheap Tupperware stock of the Gen-1 has been replaced by another cheap Tupperware stock. Color me unimpressed. I wouldn't buy one for my kids because I wouldn't want one myself. Like me, they'd rather have an AR-15.




The LOP on the DPMS Oracle I bought for my daughter got pretty short, too, which was nice for my kids when they were 7 years old, but so was the gas-operated, semi-auto action, coupled with the already mild-mannered 5.56 NATO cartridge.



I have yet to meet a 7 year old kid who would rather shoot a 6 - 6.5 pound bolt-action rifle with .270 Winchester recoil instead of an AR-15 "optics-ready carbine" in 5.56 NATO.


So far, we're saddling a kid with what is, in essence, a bargain-bin bolt action rifle with a less than stellar trigger. In order to suck even more joy out of the shooting experience, we're also getting it in a cartridge with recoil on par with a .270 Winchester. Finally, to insure the non-success of this endeavor, we have this:



I have visions of some obscure brand sold on Amazon for $35.00 to $40.00. The phrase "low end scope" has me thinking "poor quality" these days, rather than "low price." Hawke scopes don't cost much, but they tend to be usable, reasonably rugged, and reliable, without costing a lot. I've got a Weaver 2-7 x 32 that didn't cost a lot, but is slightly better optically than the Leupold Vari-X II c's that I used to use.




Which is an excellent reason to buy it chambered into something a 7 year old kid is going to want to shoot instead of what Dad thinks is the coolest thing.




I filled 21 mule deer tags, 3 pronghorn tags, 2 caribou tags, and 1 bull elk tag with the pipsqueak .250 Savage loaded to SAAMI pressure, and I couldn't count the number of California Central Coast swine I piled up wit it. Out of my Ruger M77RL Ultralight, which came with a 20" barrel, my .250 Savage ammo had the same terminal ballistic performance that I can duplicate (70 grain Barnes X) or exceed ( 77 grain Sierra Match King or Tipped Match King) with the 5.56 NATO today. You might WANT a 6.5 PRC, but you don't need one to cleanly kill the animals listed.




Hopefully less. Much less. Why? Because you also wrote this:



If you're buy a rifle for a 7 year old kid with the idea that he or she won't be shooting it much, you're buying the wrong rifle. I think you know that, yet your original post reads like it was written by someone seeking validation for a choice already made than someone seeking to make the very best possible choice.




"Old school" is me whacking mule deer with a c.1912 .250-3000 Savage instead of a more powerful .243 Winchester. I think YOU want a 6.5 PRC and you're using a 7 year old kid as an excuse to buy one. If you REALLY "always think heavier is better," then why aren't you shooting a .338 Winchester Magnum or .340 Weatherby instead of a .300 Winchester Magnum? A .375 Holland and Holland can have a 0-300 trajectory substantively similar to the .30-'06 and you never have to worry about whether you have enough gun with that cartridge.

Your thought process has nothing to do with that best suits a 7 year old kid. If your kid is going to be successful in the field, you need to ditch the idea of expecting a kid with little to no off-season practice with a rifle having the same felt recoil of a .270 Winchester is going to make clean, killing shots out to the 500 yard line.

I was a licensed guide (#2725) in California. I guided pig hunters in the Central Coast region. REGARDLESS OF AGE, the clients who shot the best in the field were those who were users of firearms, rather than mere owners; people who shot a rifle they were comfortable shooting during extended range sessions. I'd rather hunt with a kid who spent a year sending thousands of bullets from a 6mm TCU out of the barrel of a T/C Contender Carbine than a 7 year old armed with a 6.5 PRC he or she only shot a handful of times and didn't enjoy shooting.




The wind blows at Camp Perry near Port Clinton, Ohio when the National Matches are held there. A high master shooting CMP Service Rifle can score 200/200 during the slow-fire prone phase of the course of fire. He or she can do that with the 5.56 NATO at 600 yards on a target with a 36" aiming black and a 12" 10 -ring.

And he or she can do that because bullet diameter and weight doesn't mitigate wind drift. Ballistic Coefficient and flight time do.

And he or she can do that because he or she gets lots of practice shooting 600 yard prone between matches.

"The kids are pretty tough. The gun will not be used for plinking too much, but it will happen some."

No 7-year old kid is "tough." No 7 year old kid comes out of the womb with the ability to whack a pronghorn at 500 yards, either. If your 7 year old is so damn tough, why not let him or her plink away with the 6.5 PRC you've got your heart set on? I'll take a wild-ass guess and say it is because you know that kid really isn't tough enough to handle an extended range session with it.

14 posts ago (this very same page) the OP said he got a 6mm creed for his kiddo

But hey we all really enjoy your novel ringing with positivity

 

[BLJ]

14 posts ago (this very same page) the OP said he got a 6mm creed for his kiddo

But hey we all really enjoy your novel ringing with positivity

Hard to wax poetic and pay attention at the same time.

 

[Q_Sertorius]

Putting lipstick on a pig doesn't stop it from being a pig. Applying Gen-2 lipstick to the Ruger American doesn't stop it from being the bargain-bin bolt action rifle that the "RAR" was meant to be. The lipstick does drive up the price, though.

The action runs with a gritty, unrefined, unfinished feel. The trigger is creepy enough to star in a horror show. The cheap Tupperware stock of the Gen-1 has been replaced by another cheap Tupperware stock. Color me unimpressed. I wouldn't buy one for my kids because I wouldn't want one myself. Like me, they'd rather have an AR-15.




The LOP on the DPMS Oracle I bought for my daughter got pretty short, too, which was nice for my kids when they were 7 years old, but so was the gas-operated, semi-auto action, coupled with the already mild-mannered 5.56 NATO cartridge.



I have yet to meet a 7 year old kid who would rather shoot a 6 - 6.5 pound bolt-action rifle with .270 Winchester recoil instead of an AR-15 "optics-ready carbine" in 5.56 NATO.


So far, we're saddling a kid with what is, in essence, a bargain-bin bolt action rifle with a less than stellar trigger. In order to suck even more joy out of the shooting experience, we're also getting it in a cartridge with recoil on par with a .270 Winchester. Finally, to insure the non-success of this endeavor, we have this:



I have visions of some obscure brand sold on Amazon for $35.00 to $40.00. The phrase "low end scope" has me thinking "poor quality" these days, rather than "low price." Hawke scopes don't cost much, but they tend to be usable, reasonably rugged, and reliable, without costing a lot. I've got a Weaver 2-7 x 32 that didn't cost a lot, but is slightly better optically than the Leupold Vari-X II c's that I used to use.




Which is an excellent reason to buy it chambered into something a 7 year old kid is going to want to shoot instead of what Dad thinks is the coolest thing.




I filled 21 mule deer tags, 3 pronghorn tags, 2 caribou tags, and 1 bull elk tag with the pipsqueak .250 Savage loaded to SAAMI pressure, and I couldn't count the number of California Central Coast swine I piled up wit it. Out of my Ruger M77RL Ultralight, which came with a 20" barrel, my .250 Savage ammo had the same terminal ballistic performance that I can duplicate (70 grain Barnes X) or exceed ( 77 grain Sierra Match King or Tipped Match King) with the 5.56 NATO today. You might WANT a 6.5 PRC, but you don't need one to cleanly kill the animals listed.




Hopefully less. Much less. Why? Because you also wrote this:



If you're buy a rifle for a 7 year old kid with the idea that he or she won't be shooting it much, you're buying the wrong rifle. I think you know that, yet your original post reads like it was written by someone seeking validation for a choice already made than someone seeking to make the very best possible choice.




"Old school" is me whacking mule deer with a c.1912 .250-3000 Savage instead of a more powerful .243 Winchester. I think YOU want a 6.5 PRC and you're using a 7 year old kid as an excuse to buy one. If you REALLY "always think heavier is better," then why aren't you shooting a .338 Winchester Magnum or .340 Weatherby instead of a .300 Winchester Magnum? A .375 Holland and Holland can have a 0-300 trajectory substantively similar to the .30-'06 and you never have to worry about whether you have enough gun with that cartridge.

Your thought process has nothing to do with that best suits a 7 year old kid. If your kid is going to be successful in the field, you need to ditch the idea of expecting a kid with little to no off-season practice with a rifle having the same felt recoil of a .270 Winchester is going to make clean, killing shots out to the 500 yard line.

I was a licensed guide (#2725) in California. I guided pig hunters in the Central Coast region. REGARDLESS OF AGE, the clients who shot the best in the field were those who were users of firearms, rather than mere owners; people who shot a rifle they were comfortable shooting during extended range sessions. I'd rather hunt with a kid who spent a year sending thousands of bullets from a 6mm TCU out of the barrel of a T/C Contender Carbine than a 7 year old armed with a 6.5 PRC he or she only shot a handful of times and didn't enjoy shooting.




The wind blows at Camp Perry near Port Clinton, Ohio when the National Matches are held there. A high master shooting CMP Service Rifle can score 200/200 during the slow-fire prone phase of the course of fire. He or she can do that with the 5.56 NATO at 600 yards on a target with a 36" aiming black and a 12" 10 -ring.

And he or she can do that because bullet diameter and weight doesn't mitigate wind drift. Ballistic Coefficient and flight time do.

And he or she can do that because he or she gets lots of practice shooting 600 yard prone between matches.

"The kids are pretty tough. The gun will not be used for plinking too much, but it will happen some."

No 7-year old kid is "tough." No 7 year old kid comes out of the womb with the ability to whack a pronghorn at 500 yards, either. If your 7 year old is so damn tough, why not let him or her plink away with the 6.5 PRC you've got your heart set on? I'll take a wild-ass guess and say it is because you know that kid really isn't tough enough to handle an extended range session with it.

Good post. I suggest cross posting the basic lesson here into the kid’s rifle manifesto thread.

 

[BrotherMovesOn]

Nothing.
We have the Ranch(16") and the Predator(22"). I'd recommend the Ranch if you're going suppressed.
I don't think there's anything wrong with prc. My kids shoot everything from 270, 50cal muzzy to 300wm. Get ready for lots of pushback though, for smaller calibers due to recoil.
I ended up going 6.5CM because of the wide range of ammo availability and the fact that we can practice with 95gn rounds and hunt with 143gn ELDX. I was skeptical of smaller calibers, especially going for Oryx, but my son wanted to shoot the 6.5. His Oryx shot from 120yds with the Predator made it 100-120yds and piled up. So we took the ranch on my daughter's hunt and she shot an oryx at 60yds with Ranch and it was DRT. The 6.5cm has practicaly zero recoil practicing with the 95gn. And, throwing in heavier bullets to hunt with, the kids don't notice recoil on game shots.

View attachment 1007182

I like the RAR gen 2 at $500 a lot
For $600+ though, I agree with others that it is harder to justify vs a Tikka

Even though the blued tikkas like to rust, the factory stock on the RAR gen 2 is atrocious without modification IMO, and the trigger is pretty creepy. Both are big wins for Tikka to me

I’m getting my first Tikka, basic t3x. Is there anything I can do, apart from oil, to get ahead of rust on the barrel?

 

[Stinky Coyote]

Would you guys take over Canada already? Enough small talk.

Wish we could have Ar’s to hunt with. Would have been first choice for kids getting in. Got an early gen rar and dumped in lightened mdt chassis and Magpul furniture and they did really well with Grendel’s. I have played with a gen 2 creed mounting scope and adjusting trigger and it only got down to about 4 1/4 lbs, my early one went to 3.0 and so it remains, a little polishing bottom of bolt and cut a couple coils from ar mag springs and still loving the early gen rar grendel and shoots great. Only thing to draw me to a gen 2 would be a cartridge choice. Too many things now to spend money on, brake remove and dust cap, trigger replace or maybe a spring option, the stock is fugly squared. They should have just left it a pig and not put any lipstick on it. Imo

 

[Shortschaf]

I’m getting my first Tikka, basic t3x. Is there anything I can do, apart from oil, to get ahead of rust on the barrel?

Cerekote or nitride for $50-150

Clear coat or any color spray paint for $10

 

[Q_Sertorius]

I’m getting my first Tikka, basic t3x. Is there anything I can do, apart from oil, to get ahead of rust on the barrel?

Put a light coat of oil on it and don’t worry about it? Don’t leave sweaty fingerprints on it? It’s the same as any other blued rifle.

 

[craigrh13]

Putting lipstick on a pig doesn't stop it from being a pig. Applying Gen-2 lipstick to the Ruger American doesn't stop it from being the bargain-bin bolt action rifle that the "RAR" was meant to be. The lipstick does drive up the price, though.

The action runs with a gritty, unrefined, unfinished feel. The trigger is creepy enough to star in a horror show. The cheap Tupperware stock of the Gen-1 has been replaced by another cheap Tupperware stock. Color me unimpressed. I wouldn't buy one for my kids because I wouldn't want one myself. Like me, they'd rather have an AR-15.




The LOP on the DPMS Oracle I bought for my daughter got pretty short, too, which was nice for my kids when they were 7 years old, but so was the gas-operated, semi-auto action, coupled with the already mild-mannered 5.56 NATO cartridge.



I have yet to meet a 7 year old kid who would rather shoot a 6 - 6.5 pound bolt-action rifle with .270 Winchester recoil instead of an AR-15 "optics-ready carbine" in 5.56 NATO.


So far, we're saddling a kid with what is, in essence, a bargain-bin bolt action rifle with a less than stellar trigger. In order to suck even more joy out of the shooting experience, we're also getting it in a cartridge with recoil on par with a .270 Winchester. Finally, to insure the non-success of this endeavor, we have this:



I have visions of some obscure brand sold on Amazon for $35.00 to $40.00. The phrase "low end scope" has me thinking "poor quality" these days, rather than "low price." Hawke scopes don't cost much, but they tend to be usable, reasonably rugged, and reliable, without costing a lot. I've got a Weaver 2-7 x 32 that didn't cost a lot, but is slightly better optically than the Leupold Vari-X II c's that I used to use.




Which is an excellent reason to buy it chambered into something a 7 year old kid is going to want to shoot instead of what Dad thinks is the coolest thing.




I filled 21 mule deer tags, 3 pronghorn tags, 2 caribou tags, and 1 bull elk tag with the pipsqueak .250 Savage loaded to SAAMI pressure, and I couldn't count the number of California Central Coast swine I piled up wit it. Out of my Ruger M77RL Ultralight, which came with a 20" barrel, my .250 Savage ammo had the same terminal ballistic performance that I can duplicate (70 grain Barnes X) or exceed ( 77 grain Sierra Match King or Tipped Match King) with the 5.56 NATO today. You might WANT a 6.5 PRC, but you don't need one to cleanly kill the animals listed.




Hopefully less. Much less. Why? Because you also wrote this:



If you're buy a rifle for a 7 year old kid with the idea that he or she won't be shooting it much, you're buying the wrong rifle. I think you know that, yet your original post reads like it was written by someone seeking validation for a choice already made than someone seeking to make the very best possible choice.




"Old school" is me whacking mule deer with a c.1912 .250-3000 Savage instead of a more powerful .243 Winchester. I think YOU want a 6.5 PRC and you're using a 7 year old kid as an excuse to buy one. If you REALLY "always think heavier is better," then why aren't you shooting a .338 Winchester Magnum or .340 Weatherby instead of a .300 Winchester Magnum? A .375 Holland and Holland can have a 0-300 trajectory substantively similar to the .30-'06 and you never have to worry about whether you have enough gun with that cartridge.

Your thought process has nothing to do with that best suits a 7 year old kid. If your kid is going to be successful in the field, you need to ditch the idea of expecting a kid with little to no off-season practice with a rifle having the same felt recoil of a .270 Winchester is going to make clean, killing shots out to the 500 yard line.

I was a licensed guide (#2725) in California. I guided pig hunters in the Central Coast region. REGARDLESS OF AGE, the clients who shot the best in the field were those who were users of firearms, rather than mere owners; people who shot a rifle they were comfortable shooting during extended range sessions. I'd rather hunt with a kid who spent a year sending thousands of bullets from a 6mm TCU out of the barrel of a T/C Contender Carbine than a 7 year old armed with a 6.5 PRC he or she only shot a handful of times and didn't enjoy shooting.




The wind blows at Camp Perry near Port Clinton, Ohio when the National Matches are held there. A high master shooting CMP Service Rifle can score 200/200 during the slow-fire prone phase of the course of fire. He or she can do that with the 5.56 NATO at 600 yards on a target with a 36" aiming black and a 12" 10 -ring.

And he or she can do that because bullet diameter and weight doesn't mitigate wind drift. Ballistic Coefficient and flight time do.

And he or she can do that because he or she gets lots of practice shooting 600 yard prone between matches.

"The kids are pretty tough. The gun will not be used for plinking too much, but it will happen some."

No 7-year old kid is "tough." No 7 year old kid comes out of the womb with the ability to whack a pronghorn at 500 yards, either. If your 7 year old is so damn tough, why not let him or her plink away with the 6.5 PRC you've got your heart set on? I'll take a wild-ass guess and say it is because you know that kid really isn't tough enough to handle an extended range session with it.

My Ruger Gen 2 action is very nice. It got even better with some minor wet sanding and polishing. Its accuracy is outstanding right out of the box. Trigger with a new spring is just fine. For the money they are great guns. In fact I like them better than my Bergara.

 

[sneaky]

You can get ARCA rails off of Amazon for cheap.

It would match the factory stock better.

No it wouldn't. The SRS rail is a perfect fit on the RAR stock. You've obviously never seen one in person.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

 

[sneaky]

Have you had many failure to feed problems with the Ruger? I've seen some videos recently that show a few people having trouble with them operating a)smooth at all and b) not feeding from the magazine well.
It might just be some recent issues with QC.

I agree an all fronts, the ruger is a lot cheaper by the time you get the tikke threaded and in the chambering you want, though I'd argue you need to replace the stock and trigger on the rugger asap like you probably will replace the stock and barrel on the tikka(if you want one of the many chamberings in the RAR not in the tikka).

No, I run MDT AICS mags and haven't had any feeding issues. Now, trying to fumble around in the dark and unload and catch the round is a different story entirely lol.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

 

[PC356]

What is wrong with a ruger American gen 2 20” suppressed 6.5prc low end scope for the kids to grow up on? Lop gets pretty short which is nice for my 7 year old. Also its pretty low in weight. Only deer, antelope and bears will fall to this gun. 500 yards or less. Most likely run hammer hunters as I have really enjoyed them in my 300wm the last 7 years and everything has died very well for me. I know the tikkas are well talked about but I’m trying to keep this cost way down for what it is. I don’t have a desire to buy a factory rifle and then pay to have it cut down and then buy a new stock as well. The ruger seems to fit the bill the best, numbers wise. I’ve been out of the buying rifles game for a long time and am trying to figure out my research now, to purchase in two months or so.

They’re cheap, they’re accurate, and have good caliber selections bout all the good I can say. I’ve owned 4 and they all shot. Sold all but one that said. Rough cycling bolts and failures to feed were majorly annoying and happened A LOT. The Gen 2 stocks look like something out of a low budget sci fi flick, awful to look at and use. I switched the 2 Gen 2’s I had to Gen 1 stocks. Find a good deal on a used threaded 8 twist Tikka .243. Factory stock with a vertical grip and Limb Saver pad is fine. Just open up the barrel channel. If you don’t reload, 100 grain Interlocks are everywhere and cheap. Overlooked bullet that kills like hell and has enough BC to shoot a ways. If you do reload the skies the limit. Compact stocks are on eBay all the time. To me a 6.5 PRC isn’t a good caliber choice for kids to learn on.