This is what the latest public health message has morphed into. But who really knows if this will work well, when there are limits to the sensitivity/timing of the tests, and so many asymptomatic infected people?
Many areas have had very little confirmed cases compared to the area's entire population, so there will almost undoubtedly always be some new cases in a population that is relatively naive to the virus, regardless of restrictions.
My friend suggested that, other than the RNA test for live virus, the tests we have are not very good. The notion is that they are ok for contact tracing (e.g. if you are testing a group that has been exposed and there are 1-2 bad results out of 10 that is ok since the group results are directionally correct).
Time will tell how this plays out, but the more I learn, the more I feel like our national infrastructure is failing us. It seems like in other countries who successfully relaxed restrictions did so following the deployment of an extensive testing regiment. We don't have that but are already relaxing. Feels like we are willfully driving blind.