- Joined
- Jan 5, 2012
- Messages
- 8,978
No doubt! Gun and gun parts have been hard to sell lately.To each his own I guess. I bet they sell piles of them, they have run a successful company for years and think they know what they are doing.
No doubt! Gun and gun parts have been hard to sell lately.To each his own I guess. I bet they sell piles of them, they have run a successful company for years and think they know what they are doing.
I mostly agree with this - but are you referring to the Trigger Tech being garbage?You're welcome!
Their first action in fifty years, and they made a slightly better 700 action. The same shit triggers nothing integrated. Slow clap....
I guess I am not easily impressed.
The 700 trigger design, in general, is crap. The trigger brand really doesn't matter. There are several threads on here and on other forums about this issue. Heck, I am going to the NF ELR shoot tomorrow. I talked to a few shooters this week that have shot the NF shoot a couple of times and both said to bring an extra trigger because of the dust.I mostly agree with this - but are you referring to the Trigger Tech being garbage?
Got to agreed with RA here. I got excited to see what all the fuss was about with the 307, studied for a minute, and was instantly disappointed that overall it's just (TO ME) a branded/dressed up copy of the same concept/operating principles that I don't care for in the current market of rifle actions. Some good features, some cool improvements, some important things completely unaddressed nor improved.You're welcome!
Their first action in fifty years, and they made a slightly better 700 action. The same shit triggers nothing integrated. Slow clap....
I guess I am not easily impressed.
I bet the sell them well also.To each his own I guess. I bet they sell piles of them, they have run a successful company for years and think they know what they are doing.
Wow, you came up with all those facts about who invented what, and you can't even figure out which model Savage has been continuously produced since 1958? Interesting.
Hi Ryan, in your eyes what action has the best trigger design?The 700 trigger design, in general, is crap. The trigger brand really doesn't matter. There are several threads on here and on other forums about this issue. Heck, I am going to the NF ELR shoot tomorrow. I talked to a few shooters this week that have shot the NF shoot a couple of times and both said to bring an extra trigger because of the dust.
Since he’s potentially off the grid…Hi Ryan, in your eyes what action has the best trigger design?
source pleaseThere isn’t one. Next
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
source please
Odd I owned a 1959 model 110. Rebarreled it in fact. Maybe you just need more experience with Savage 110’s.You go first
The 110 was released in 63.
None of savages line from 1958 exist
Every conceivable part on the 1963 110 has been changed and only the name remains.
For a fanboy you know very little about your favorite brand.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You go first
The 110 was released in 63.
None of savages line from 1958 exist
Every conceivable part on the 1963 110 has been changed and only the name remains.
For a fanboy you know very little about your favorite brand.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's weak sauce. He was correct and you were wrong. The fact that they have updated the design over the years is not surprising. Nevertheless, it is the same basic design -> any changes to the barrel nut over the years have been immaterial.
For example,
I have seen a few Model T's . I am trying to remember how many inches wide that computer screen was on the dash, oh well.Sure and the f350 tremor is a model T. Same basic design
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk