UM/S2H/Suppressors/Scopes and More!

I've really enjoyed the past three pages, wow. Elitest sound engineer vibes, #science, the "who owns the company" question for the 30th time, sick drop ins from the "dissenting crowd" on the wrong side of every discussion. A little 33XC flex. Great vibes here.

We had a bit of a Douglas Murray show going on, but things have settled back down now.

“But have you beeen?”
 
We tested the suppressor today with five shots from my 33XC… took it like a champ…. ******* Science!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Doesn’t this qualify as a unreplicated science experiment? Technically your sample size is your number of suppressors. And your post qualifies as taking notes. We might have to start calling you Dr. Avery. 😁
 
The latest podcast from Exo had the guy from Pew Science talking about suppressors.

There was so much fluffery/not really answering questions mixed with excess verbiage and jargon, that I'm not sure if I actually learned anything or not. :confused:

Disappointingly, he agreed that tone was important ... but didn't say much about it.

And his continued reference to magnums as being relevant/necessary for hunting big game (and that he'd never heard of Exo) suggested that he may not be particularly exposed to wider hunting data, practice, debates, etc.

Would be interested to hear Form's take on it all ...
 
Fixed it for you.

But then again, I'm pretty sure @mxgsfmdpx would just spraypaint them if he really wanted to ...
I had sent him an orange body mag to put through its paces already and was making an joke that I should have sent him pink apparently. :p

Anyways sorry for the derail. Just killing time till we find out more about that scope!


1746880194391.jpeg
 
I’m just waiting for the day that unknown can design a bow that weighs 3.5 lbs, can be dry fired in your living room without exploding, draws like a toy, the back wall like Thor’s hammer, and can shoot a 450 gr arrow at 300fps regardless of draw length. Is that too much to ask? I might have missed some desired characteristics.
 
The latest podcast from Exo had the guy from Pew Science talking about suppressors.

There was so much fluffery/not really answering questions mixed with excess verbiage and jargon, that I'm not sure if I actually learned anything or not. :confused:

Disappointingly, he agreed that tone was important ... but didn't say much about it.

And his continued reference to magnums as being relevant/necessary for hunting big game (and that he'd never heard of Exo) suggested that he may not be particularly exposed to wider hunting data, practice, debates, etc.

Would be interested to hear Form's take on it all ...
I turned it off, the way he was oversimplifying while using excessively technical jargon made it seem like he was talking down on hunters.

He admitted that he wasn't familiar with exo at all, it would have been good for him to listen to some previous episodes to gather a baseline of the listeners knowledge.
 
I turned it off, the way he was oversimplifying while using excessively technical jargon made it seem like he was talking down on hunters.

He admitted that he wasn't familiar with exo at all, it would have been good for him to listen to some previous episodes to gather a baseline of the listeners knowledge.
I agree with both of your assessments. It was disappointing.

It explained a lot of why the PewScience website looks the way it does with tons of excess information.

The ability to distill down lots of complicated information into brief consumable segments is not his/its strong suit.
 
I agree with both of your assessments. It was disappointing.

It explained a lot of why the PewScience website looks the way it does with tons of excess information.

The ability to distill down lots of complicated information into brief consumable segments is not his/its strong suit.
I love almost every exo podcast, but that was absolutely painful. Not sure how you can use so much technical jargon while also sounding like you don’t know what you’re talking about.
 
We will be using silencershop for transfers inside the Unknown Munitions shop, other than that we will be form 3 transferring to any dealer of your choosing and it is up to them how they want to do the form 4.

For a guy over in Western WA, would it be more economical to Form 3 it to a dealer here or drive over to Post Falls for a weekend? I assume I only need to be physically present for pickup. And I need to ask a few dealers about their Form 3 costs to determine that a bit. Might be able to visit my steel fabricator in Spokane on a Friday and have the gas paid for.
 
For a guy over in Western WA, would it be more economical to Form 3 it to a dealer here or drive over to Post Falls for a weekend? I assume I only need to be physically present for pickup. And I need to ask a few dealers about their Form 3 costs to determine that a bit. Might be able to visit my steel fabricator in Spokane on a Friday and have the gas paid for.
if you don’t get an immediate approval, you would have to drive back over on another occasion to pick it up.
 
For a guy over in Western WA, would it be more economical to Form 3 it to a dealer here or drive over to Post Falls for a weekend? I assume I only need to be physically present for pickup. And I need to ask a few dealers about their Form 3 costs to determine that a bit. Might be able to visit my steel fabricator in Spokane on a Friday and have the gas paid for.
Is a dealer allowed to form 4 a can to a non-resident of the state the dealer is licensed? Probably something you need to verify. Otherwise form 3 to a dealer in your state would be needed.
 
Back
Top