couesbitten
WKR
I'll throw my vote in for the Falken Wildpeaks. I've got more than 33k on mine and don't see them running less than another 33k.
I wonder if those of you getting substandard treadwear on three-quarter and 1 ton pick ups are aware of your load rating. You need at least an E or even an F rating. Put a C or D rated tire on those heavy trucks and you will burn right through the tread.
Similarly, those talking about 10 ply versus six ply, that is old technology and Terminology. With modern materials most tires these days only run one ply, or sometimes 2-3 depending on material, yet they have the same load rating and probably superior strength and puncture resistance than the old school “10 ply” or better. So those saying you absolutely need a 10 ply tire don’t even understand what they are saying anymore. Assuming the proper amount of weight above them, the sidewall puncture strength will all be about the same.
Here is some practicality:
Jeeps, and Toyota’s - C rated is fine. D if you carry loads. Anything more is overkill, additional weight, loss of power and mileage, and gains nothing.
half tons - D is fine.
3/4 tons - E
1 tons and heavy towing - F
Then other than that, buy the tread pattern and purpose for your needed application. Don’t run a mud tire in the snow and expect good performance. Don’t run an AT tire in sticky mud and expect good performance. Use the right load rating, rotate them regularly, inflate them properly, don’t drive like a fool, and buy the right style tire for the right purpose and they will all do a similarly good job and last about the same. The details and anecdotes are nothing more than just good forum fodder.
Lucky I guess. I live on a gravel road in NW Arkansas and my neighbors have talked about cut tires but I haven't had a problem. I spend a lot of time and miles on 29N, I 70 and 35N out of Kansas City to get to where I hunt and I like the extra fuel mileage. But your right. If I was having tire problems on roads where I lived or hunt, I would quickly buy a set of E rated 10 plys. That hasn't happened yet....knock on wood. Everything has a cost/benefit and you pick your poison.u must have never traveled on any red scoria rock roads or you wouldn't have made if far with them 2 or 6plys
I have a buddy who unknowingly drove his Chevy 2500 out of the shop with P rated AT tires. When they wore out after 25k and several flats he cursed Firestone tires. I had to explain it wasn’t the tire’s fault. It was the idiot who put mini van tires on your big rig!10 ply rating is load E. True it just confuses people, but it's where we are at.
As far as not using E rated tires on light trucks it really is the never ending debate. You know enough to know both sides and that it goes round and round.
Will a tire shop even put C or D rated tires on a 3/4 or 1 ton truck? I was told once they wouldn't, but don't know it for a fact. I only have a heavy truck to move weight so never considered it.
View attachment 320310
what load range were your KO2's? what load range are your Maxx?I just wore out a set of K02's on my 17 Tacoma, in my experience they were prone to flats and were average to below average in snow (cat hunting), however they lasted a long time (85000km) with lots of abuse.
I had a set of Cooper St Maxx's on my f150 for a season and loved them but sold the truck they were on. I put another set on the Tacoma this week and again am very happy with them.
I have 2 buddies who run the Falken wildpeak's (at3w I believe) and they really like them a lot as well.
I’ve always thought a 10 ply tire would be better in the realm of puncture resistance. Then I read that applies to the old ply rating and that the new technology using load rating makes ply rating obsolete and that E rated tires offer more in load capacity, but not in puncture resistance.
I compared the weight of the tire I’m using (E rated BFG KO2) vs a like size KO2 in C rating. The E rated tires weigh ~ 7 lbs more than the C rated tires, so obviously something is different in the tire carcass.
Soooo I emailed BFG and asked them simply if their E rated KO2 provided more puncture resistance than the C rated one.
Got the email back and their answer was YES it does, in the sidewall. No mention of the tread. It makes sense as the sidewall has to be stiffer (beefed up) to provide more load capacity.
Soooo…. if you’re concerned with sidewall punctures, consider a E rated tire, if not and you don’t need the the extra load capacity, consider a C rated tire.
Nice to finally have that squared away