Thread adapters: Why the hate?

Antares

WKR
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Messages
2,517
Location
Alaska
There seem to be a lot of post where guys are looking for suggestions on rifles or barrels that are threaded 5/8-24 and then they follow up with something along the lines of "not interested in using adapters." Why is this?

It always seems to be followed with "blah, blah, blah, tolerance stacking, blah, blah, blah, baffle strikes..." but there seems to be very little actual evidence of negative outcomes from adapter use. To be clear, I'm talking about high quality adapters intended for use with muzzle devices, not Chinese plumbing parts off eBay. It almost feels like a different version of the "ELDMs grenading with no penetration" hysteria; lots of people say it happens, but very few seem to have any evidence to support it.

My sense is that a lot of the aversion to adapters is from guys who don't like the aesthetics of them but are unwilling to admit that they want their rifle to be "pretty" so they try to make a technical argument instead (i.e., tolerance stacking, etc.). I don't care what the rifle looks like, I care what the groups look like.

There, I said it.

And before you even start, it's called Roksett. Use it.
 
I use several adapters. I have had several baffle strikes. Not one of those strikes had an adapter. 7RM, 270WSM, etc. Not a single issue. Custom made and amazon specials. Never an issue.

But I'm also the guy the shoots .243 cal bullets through .22 end caps. I guess I just like to live dangerously.
 
My experience is only with a couple cheap ones (factory Silencer Central and cheapo Amazon, they're essentially identical) but neither had any issues when checked with a clearance rod or while shooting. Just check with a clearance rod and go, it's a cheap and easy way to get cans on thin barrels.
If they're manufacturing them in a single setup on a CNC, which is the only thing that makes any sense, that's going to be as precise as most any thread on the end of a rifle barrel. Referencing "tolerance stacking" without having measured it is not so different from referencing wallop in relation to lethality.
 
There seem to be a lot of post where guys are looking for suggestions on rifles or barrels that are threaded 5/8-24 and then they follow up with something along the lines of "not interested in using adapters." Why is this?

It always seems to be followed with "blah, blah, blah, tolerance stacking, blah, blah, blah, baffle strikes..." but there seems to be very little actual evidence of negative outcomes from adapter use. To be clear, I'm talking about high quality adapters intended for use with muzzle devices, not Chinese plumbing parts off eBay. It almost feels like a different version of the "ELDMs grenading with no penetration" hysteria; lots of people say it happens, but very few seem to have any evidence to support it.

My sense is that a lot of the aversion to adapters is from guys who don't like the aesthetics of them but are unwilling to admit that they want their rifle to be "pretty" so they try to make a technical argument instead (i.e., tolerance stacking, etc.). I don't care what the rifle looks like, I care what the groups look like.

There, I said it.

And before you even start, it's called Roksett. Use it.
I have one adapter stuck in a can, installed by UM. It's not a big deal, it doesn't affect the can or shooting other than being dedicated to that rifle becasue its the only one I have with 1/2" threads, but if I were to do it again, I would use the other style of UM's adapter that uses their special tool so I could remove it.
 
Back
Top