The New Leupold Mark 4HD?

[Axlrod]

It was speculation. I will be patient. Apologies

No worries. You might be onto something after all. @ID_Matt is wearing a Leupy hat! I hope they didn't give that to him...

 

[ID_Matt]

No worries. You might be onto something after all. @ID_Matt is wearing a Leupy hat! I hope they didn't give that to him...

Haha! I realized the hat after I was already to the range. I have no bias. I recorded most of it, even my self panting 100 yards down range to check the target

 

[ID_Matt]

Posted my findings in the field evaluations section….

 

[AZ_Hunter]

Link?

 

[mddat]

Link please


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Leupold Mark 4 6-24X52 mini drop eval

This is the first time I’ve dropped a scope so bare with me…. I’ll try to follow the normal protocol as best as I can while providing some subjective feelings as well. Have had this scope for a few months now. I would guess it has around 400 rounds through it in a 6.5 creed between NRL hunter...

rokslide.com

 

[NevadaMike]

Inventing a story out of nothing is never accurate. Be patient, i'm sure it will be posted when ready. Saying Leupold has control over these tests is way off base. To date they have zero current models that work at all, according to the tests. And the testors have gone above and beyond to show all tests are as objective ( no pun intended) as possible.

Leupold could give two s%^#s about the “drop test.” Maven scoffed at the drop test recently as well in an interview about the 1.2. I was at an event with both the leupold rep and the Nightforce rep when a competitor mentioned the “drop test.” They looked at each other and just laughed and nothing else was said. That same day I personally saw one of the Nightforce scopes that "passed" fail to hold zero. Do I think Nightforce is bad? Of course not! A sample size of one in varying conditions means nothing. Manufacturers that have machines dedicated to replicating shock way beyond the drop and collimators that measure changes much more precisely know this.

 

[Jaxmin]

I was just wondering if anyone has had any time behind one yet. I know it was just released, but I do know companies allow certain people to have access to the product before releasing it. From the looks of it and specs it should be a great seller. I like the 4.5-18. If it can prove to be reliable and track it will be great in the market place. If so it will rival the Nx8 and Trijicon Tenmile in sales. Which I have both and love! They are currently out of stock on the website. I'm strongly considering picking one up.

N,N
315-805-5179

 

[LoH]

Leupold could give two s%^#s about the “drop test.” Maven scoffed at the drop test recently as well in an interview about the 1.2. I was at an event with both the leupold rep and the Nightforce rep when a competitor mentioned the “drop test.” They looked at each other and just laughed and nothing else was said. That same day I personally saw one of the Nightforce scopes that "passed" fail to hold zero. Do I think Nightforce is bad? Of course not! A sample size of one in varying conditions means nothing. Manufacturers that have machines dedicated to replicating shock way beyond the drop and collimators that measure changes much more precisely know this.

Would you point me in the direction of the interview with Maven that you mention here? I’d be interested to have a listen.