The Gun Every American Should Own

Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
962
Location
Lyon County, NV
For hunting? Does low magnification matter?

Yes, to both. Not looking for an LPVO in this case - will be picking up the NX8 you recommended, that will be replacing a Swaro Z8i 1-8x on an all-around carbine. I love the Swarovskis, especially with the various optical advantages I seem to get with it over most LPVOs I've spent time behind, but for that particular build I want bombproof. I'm also just now getting into more precision/long range shooting, and learning how to use mil reticles.

This other question here, that has me hovering around a Polar, is related to a second upper I'm putting together for that same rifle. It's a 20" 6mm Max, that'll be dedicated to hunting and all-around work. Everything from close-in coyotes and bobcats running in the sage, to deer/antelope, and longer range varmint and predator hunting. And in some cases and places, as legal, moonlight hunting when thermal isn't an option. Lowest power settings from 2 or 2.5 would be fine, up to 4x for the highest low-power setting. Not concerned as much about high-end magnification, but 10x would be minimum for high end. Cost is not an issue. Reliability, durability, and top-tier low-light capability are the biggest priorities. Lightweight is nice but not critical, but a 2lb scope would be a bit much. And as I get my longer-distance skills up to speed, a reticle with the best field-use advantages would be important as well.

Thanks for giving this some consideration, will look forward to your thoughts.
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,344
Yes, to both. Not looking for an LPVO in this case - will be picking up the NX8 you recommended, that will be replacing a Swaro Z8i 1-8x on an all-around carbine. I love the Swarovskis, especially with the various optical advantages I seem to get with it over most LPVOs I've spent time behind, but for that particular build I want bombproof. I'm also just now getting into more precision/long range shooting, and learning how to use mil reticles.

This other question here, that has me hovering around a Polar, is related to a second upper I'm putting together for that same rifle. It's a 20" 6mm Max, that'll be dedicated to hunting and all-around work. Everything from close-in coyotes and bobcats running in the sage, to deer/antelope, and longer range varmint and predator hunting. And in some cases and places, as legal, moonlight hunting when thermal isn't an option. Lowest power settings from 2 or 2.5 would be fine, up to 4x for the highest low-power setting. Not concerned as much about high-end magnification, but 10x would be minimum for high end. Cost is not an issue. Reliability, durability, and top-tier low-light capability are the biggest priorities. Lightweight is nice but not critical, but a 2lb scope would be a bit much. And as I get my longer-distance skills up to speed, a reticle with the best field-use advantages would be important as well.

Thanks for giving this some consideration, will look forward to your thoughts.


This one-



And if you don’t need kroebthan 3.2mils of elevation (they may be able to do a 4.8mil turret), this one with the P3 reticle-

 
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
962
Location
Lyon County, NV
This one-



And if you don’t need kroebthan 3.2mils of elevation (they may be able to do a 4.8mil turret), this one with the P3 reticle-


Awesome, thank you.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
962
Location
Lyon County, NV
This one-



And if you don’t need kroebthan 3.2mils of elevation (they may be able to do a 4.8mil turret), this one with the P3 reticle-



Had a follow-up on this - just came across the Low Light comparison thread it looks like you posted about a week ago. Hadn't seen it at all, but went through it in detail just now. Your points about the importance of reticle design really stood out, especially with what you said about the Minox ZP5's THLR reticle. That caused me to run a search here, hoping you'd done drop tests on the ZP5, which I was very happy to see you'd done, including follow-ups after a year or so. It was great info. (Anyone interested, that field eval thread's here, with a separate Q&A thread on the ZP5 here).

I'm expecting to pick up the S&B Polar you recommended soon, but everything I've just read from you on the Minox ZP5, especially with that THLR reticle, has just given me pause. They're within a couple of ounces of each other, similarly priced, the Minox appears to be sufficiently rugged...

...what circumstances or uses would you recommend one over the other? Does either excel in a way the other doesn't?
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,344
Had a follow-up on this - just came across the Low Light comparison thread it looks like you posted about a week ago. Hadn't seen it at all, but went through it in detail just now. Your points about the importance of reticle design really stood out, especially with what you said about the Minox ZP5's THLR reticle. That caused me to run a search here, hoping you'd done drop tests on the ZP5, which I was very happy to see you'd done, including follow-ups after a year or so. It was great info. (Anyone interested, that field eval thread's here, with a separate Q&A thread on the ZP5 here).

I'm expecting to pick up the S&B Polar you recommended soon, but everything I've just read from you on the Minox ZP5, especially with that THLR reticle, has just given me pause. They're within a couple of ounces of each other, similarly priced, the Minox appears to be sufficiently rugged...

...what circumstances or uses would you recommend one over the other? Does either excel in a way the other doesn't?


The ZP5 5-25x56mm is a large scope. If the size isn’t a detriment to your use, and you understand the reticle- the ZP5 with THLR reticle is 100% what I would choose for lowlight/night shooting without illumination.
 
Top