Interesting thread, in most states biologists have gone from the old model of being uniform wearing "gamekeepers" and in the field to working from home wearing crocs and looking at computer models and registration data to determine what is going on. In my home state the easiest job in natural resources is being a biologist because nobody will listen to you or take you seriously. Its not their fault, I've been at the meetings where they have put on a 60min presentation only to have some politician tell the crowd "My brother in law hunts alot, and he says....." and have decisions based on that logic instead.
I also believe that if you are east of the Mississippi that land fragmentation is the threat to hunting, and to the west hunting will become more a big business strategy than it already is. Western states dont want the dude in the pickup who only buys a few tanks of fuel and a license, they want the guy who flies in and drops $1000's on lodging, steak dinners, outfitters, and healthy tips. The working class who relies on public land should really be paying attention.
I admittedly don't attend public meetings like I used to, quite honestly I found them to be stacked with old timers who felt every decision by a govt agency was a conspiracy and couldn't see past the next season. These "threat" discussions are what we should be discussing and working on, even though we have the ability to hunt this fall, we should really be wondering about the opportunities our kids may have......thankfully the generations before US were not as short sighted.