@MT_Wyatt now I’m being unreasonable!
If I get the BanHammer, it was worth it. #NoRagrets.
View attachment 840075
View attachment 840076
View attachment 840087
View attachment 840086
View attachment 840084
View attachment 840081
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0bee/e0bee384a3536dfb7039042376fffa6ab52f19c6" alt="Face with tears of joy :joy: 😂"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@MT_Wyatt now I’m being unreasonable!
If I get the BanHammer, it was worth it. #NoRagrets.
View attachment 840075
View attachment 840076
View attachment 840087
View attachment 840086
View attachment 840084
View attachment 840081
I don't think those markings are moving because the receiver is elongating, the axial load and temp are not high enough for creep to be a concern in steel. More likely, the threads are getting smoothed out a bit on the barrel tennon, allowing you to get more travel for the same torque.
Depending on how the barrels are manufactured/rifled anywhere from 7-8 works fine with Hornady 80s and 88s.Hornady doesn't like the 1 in 7. There is a whole podcast about it. I think the SAAMI spec is 1 in 8.
I keep being told “I’ve never”, and yet every single time people show up with them, failures happen. First day of class this week- a BAT had a failure to feed on round 2, and a failure to eject on round 18. The shooter cleared the case very quickly, but it still did it. We had them leave the bolt back, and ejection port up while it was snowing. One guy didn’t know or blow out any of the snow in the action (it was nearly full), and chambered it. That compressed the snow and made it basically ice in the lug area. Took a bit of smacking the bolt handle to get it to close in a chambered round, but we got it.
View attachment 840865
Shooting in this today, it took all of the 1st round to get a case that had to have the bolt banged open to extract, and then round number 2 to get a failure to fire due freezing in an R700
View attachment 840863
View attachment 840864
To be fair it did get a little bit of snow on it two days ago (like all the other rifles), got brushed off then set in the enclosed trailer. None of the Tikkas today or yesterday have had failures, nor has the MRC’s had any feed/function issues.
View attachment 840866
I swear to god. What are the odds. One week after talking shit about “never having an issue” with light strikes or stuck triggers hahahahaha.Oh... you're gonna tell us. You won't be able to help yourself. HAHA!
I swear to god. What are the odds. One week after talking shit about “never having an issue” with light strikes or stuck triggers hahahahaha.
Out doing some positional shooting with the 22CM this weekend. Light strike and no fire. Was fine before and fine after. Not sure what to chalk it up to, but it happened. Damn Bix N Andy lol
View attachment 845356
Funny how the universe works sometimes lol
Only plausible explanationHahahaha
It’s MAGIC!!!![]()
To tell you the truth, I don't have the foggiest idea, but I'll find out. That's something the marketing guys came up with and are handling. More than likely, it's the first 100 shipped.@Imac45acp. Did we ever clarify if it’ll be the 1st 100 orders or 1 st 100 rifles that you were going to add a little something?
Hopefully the shows went well and orders are stacking up.
Twist on the 22creed is something we're going to be testing heavily. I have the strong feeling the 18" barrel isn't going to generate the speed to grenade 80s, but the proof is in testing. We'll also reevaluate when we do the 22"s to make sure the preferred projectiles stay in one piece. Trust me guys, your concerns are heard loud and clear.Depending on how the barrels are manufactured/rifled anywhere from 7-8 works fine with Hornady 80s and 88s.
Absolutely, but I'm not planning on having Form's test gun to display like we had at Western.@Imac45acp will there be a Rokstok Marshall at the Denver expo in a few weeks?
Rail is 0 MOA.I wanted to know if the integral rail had 20 MOA.
I’ve never seen one that wasn’t but since it was never mentioned, I sent an email asking about it.
The response from MRC was that the integral rail is 0 MOA.
Only reason I can think of for not having 20 MOA built in is that many of their customers may be using basic 1” 3-9 scopes that don’t have enough internal adjustment?
Just an FYI if most people are like me and assumed the rail would be 20 MOA