Second guessing wife's rifle purchase.

[ScreamingPotato]

I say stick with the CM since that’s what you already have. It will give more velocity out further if the opportunity presents itself and she feels comfortable taking it. I say that based on the plan to take it on an elk hunt and it being kinda her do all rifle. Otherwise either cartridge will do whatever you want inside 300 yards for most game.

That was my thinking that got me to the CM to begin with. With enough practice I'd like for her to increase her range to 400 in certain situations. But if the extra recoil hurts her overall progress she'd be better of with the ARC.

 

[ScreamingPotato]

Good luck fitting 73ms, I haven’t been able to in gen 1 and definitely cans in gen2 atleast in my two. I fit 77tmk in gen 1 but still a bit short for where I need to be to get accuracy. 75eldm is a long long bullet I can’t fit into either. Kinda bummed but have been single shooting and man they are nice

Man that is close! I don't think they're touching but they're almost too close to tell. Rounds cycled fine in the action, little dent in one of the brass though.

 

[MoeFaux]

Yes, you're overthinking it.

She's obviously shot the 308 well for some time, so dropping down to the creedmoor will be a huge boost in comfort and confidence. The 6CM has 41% less free recoil energy on average*. That's HUGE.

The ONLY reason that I see to switch to the ARC is if you really prefer the shorter barrel. If this is just a question of caliber/recoil - put her behind the Ruger you already have and watch her smile when she's still shooting MOA after 100 shots in one sitting.

*18.27 ft-lbs v 10.89 ft-lbs per backfire.tv/recoil/

 

[David Walter]

22 trainer is a great idea. A 22 will teach you about wind and about position, etc.

That’s the money.

I find that a 22 follows the 1/3 rule. If you want to shoot 300 yards with your center fire, practice a lot at 100 with your 22. Sitting, prone, kneeling, with sticks, bipod, etc. It’ll help her to sort out fundamentals.

At least it seems that way to me. Holds true for a 308-ish.

 

[mtnbound]

Looking for some spitballing, seems I'm never satisfied no matter what I decide and leads me to just keep buying ****.

Wife has killed a bunch of stuff with her pink death stick, deer elk and a nilgai. It's just a cheap TC Compass 308 in a pink Boyd's stock sized appropriately for her. This year she didn't shoot well on a buck and I'm wanting to reduce the recoil for her and put a thousand rounds down range before her elk hunt in October (she should get a WY general tag). She shoots it great on the bench at 300 yards but in field positions not so much and she wears out on the bench around 30 rounds or so, so I know it's kicking her. She loves that rifle because of the stock though.

I purchased a OC Polonium K for her and it's ready to go.

I went ahead and bought her a Ruger Gen2 standard 20" 6mm CM because of the easy stock adjustments and price points. I'm planning to move her Huron from the 308 because she's used to it.

Now I'm kicking myself because I'm really attracted to the Gen2 Ranch 16" in 6 ARC without too much penalty.

I also purchased an identical Ruger Gen2 20" in 223 to practice with even cheaper ammo and have a Huron incoming for that one. I'd plan to use this one myself for deer and she can practice with it.

The 6mm CM is brand new still in box so I should be able to recoup funds and buy the Ranch in 6 ARC.

This whole thing started due to wanting to minimize recoil and blast so she can focus better. Looking for discussion whether I'm overthinking things or if there would be a real noticable benefit to the 6 ARC with both being suppressed. I can upgrade the Polonium K to a Nomad XC if need be as well, doubtful we'd be shooting my rifle and her's on the same trips.

At the ranges you mention I would stay with the ARC. I love the 6CM but I also like having common calibers between me and the wife.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk