Looking for some spitballing, seems I'm never satisfied no matter what I decide and leads me to just keep buying ****.
Wife has killed a bunch of stuff with her pink death stick, deer elk and a nilgai. It's just a cheap TC Compass 308 in a pink Boyd's stock sized appropriately for her. This year she didn't shoot well on a buck and I'm wanting to reduce the recoil for her and put a thousand rounds down range before her elk hunt in October (she should get a WY general tag). She shoots it great on the bench at 300 yards but in field positions not so much and she wears out on the bench around 30 rounds or so, so I know it's kicking her. She loves that rifle because of the stock though.
I purchased a OC Polonium K for her and it's ready to go.
I went ahead and bought her a Ruger Gen2 standard 20" 6mm CM because of the easy stock adjustments and price points. I'm planning to move her Huron from the 308 because she's used to it.
Now I'm kicking myself because I'm really attracted to the Gen2 Ranch 16" in 6 ARC without too much penalty.
I also purchased an identical Ruger Gen2 20" in 223 to practice with even cheaper ammo and have a Huron incoming for that one. I'd plan to use this one myself for deer and she can practice with it.
The 6mm CM is brand new still in box so I should be able to recoup funds and buy the Ranch in 6 ARC.
This whole thing started due to wanting to minimize recoil and blast so she can focus better. Looking for discussion whether I'm overthinking things or if there would be a real noticable benefit to the 6 ARC with both being suppressed. I can upgrade the Polonium K to a Nomad XC if need be as well, doubtful we'd be shooting my rifle and her's on the same trips.