Project 2025 and public lands and environment

[PLhunter]

This was discussed before but most claimed it wasn’t a serious document or wouldn’t be played out. Seems how the architects are now in power (Vought, Stephen Miller, Carr etc.) and they are checking off items line by line I think it is a good idea to start strategizing for protecting public land as well as environmental resources with a compromised/severed system of checks and balances. Considering the acquisition of legislatively appropriated funds what can be done to support reseeding, conservation, and mitigating industrial pollution of lands and waters? The threat of implementation seems more real than it did when it was first laughed off here and I think we should be prepared to have those public land and environment fights become reality. There is more evidence supporting it as a threat than dismissing it.

 

[Dos XX]

I don't really pay attention to a lot of news. What document? What specific items are they checking off line by line? Can you post the document or a link to the document?

 

[CJ19]

This topic was closed once already. I can not wait until DOGE starts going through the conservation lobbyist swamp and hopefully i can see some of the nonsense my hard earned money has been funding.

 

[Gila]

I think it would be wise to toss the politics and get into the meat of the situation. The focus should be on the Dept of the Interior. I think Doug Burgum is going to be better than the anti-hunting Deb Haaland was. She was totally ignorant about hunting and believed that predator “restoration” was the way to manage ungulates. She also endorsed grazing buffalo that were just “zoo” animals on BLM land. Those buffalo are not to be consumed because the herds are from APR “parks” for eco-tourism. I am just hoping that the funding goes away for these predator “recovery” projects. Any changes would be welcome because I don’t think the DOI could get any worse than it is now.