6.5Express
Lil-Rokslider
Been reloading for about 20 years on an RCBS Rockchucker and getting the itch to buy a forster co-ax. What other presses should i be considering?
Not having to swap shell holders or fiddle with dies every time you change cartridges is enough of an advantage for me. The co ax supposedly seats better (little runout) but I’ve never measured it.Just...curious
Why do you folks want a co-ax when you have a Rock Chucker?
I've watched that link a few times, and surprisingly, the ol' Rock Chucker lands way up near the top of the heap.
We must think alot alike, I've been loading on an old chucker for 20yrs. Ended up buying a coax and a t7. Coax is so nice without shell holders and just slipping dies in and out, sold the t7. Make sure to keep rockchucker for decappping to keep coax clean.Been reloading for about 20 years on an RCBS Rockchucker and getting the itch to buy a forster co-ax. What other presses should i be considering?
Then you just probably are not making as good of ammo as you could be.I must be doing something wrong with my Rock Chucker, cause I’m not fiddling with my dies near as much as it sounds like some of y’all are.
Then you just probably are not making as good of ammo as you could be.
Unless you have some seriously calibrated for torque hands the dies won't be re installed exactly every time. When measuring seating depth to the .001 it makes a difference.
I'm not trying to just make ammo. I want to make the most repeatable ammo I can.
Does it actually make a difference. Alot of people say no way. But it does in my head.
Not if you measure off of the ogive instead of the tip. My ammo isn't "in spec" its based off what the chamber and rifle says it likes.I don’t know. My measurements are within specs. Heck, you’ll notice more difference in the bullets than that.
Not if you measure off of the ogive instead of the tip. My ammo isn't "in spec" its based off what the chamber and rifle says it likes.