lowade1111
FNG
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2023
- Messages
- 25
Hey all,
I ordered a Peak44 Blacktooth stock on October 1st, and it took 7 weeks to be made and delivered, arriving on November 20th. Upon inspecting the stock, I found that the forend swivel stud was either overtightened during assembly or the threaded sleeve was pressed too far, causing cracks and material breakage inside the barrel channel opposite the stud.
I immediately contacted Peak44 customer service, and they responded the next morning. They provided a return shipping label and informed me that a replacement stock was being added to the build queue for expedited production.
Seven weeks later (the same amount of time as the original wait), I received the stock again. Upon inspection, it became clear that the stock had been repaired rather than replaced. It appeared that new material had been applied over the damaged area, and the original stock was sent back to me.
This was disappointing as I had been under the impression that I would be receiving a replacement stock, not a repaired one. The process took 14 weeks, and in the end, I received the same stock with a repair that could have likely been completed in a few days. I called customer service to express my concerns, and they reassured me that the stock would still be covered under warranty and replaced if it fails in the future.
While customer service has been responsive and assuring, I’m still hesitant to keep the stock since it doesn’t meet the expectations set by the original communication. There was no follow-up informing me that the stock would be repaired instead of replaced, and it almost seems like I’ve been sent back a repaired item to be passed off as new.
Has anyone else experienced a similar situation with Peak44, or do you have any advice on how to proceed? See attached photos of original vs repair.
I ordered a Peak44 Blacktooth stock on October 1st, and it took 7 weeks to be made and delivered, arriving on November 20th. Upon inspecting the stock, I found that the forend swivel stud was either overtightened during assembly or the threaded sleeve was pressed too far, causing cracks and material breakage inside the barrel channel opposite the stud.
I immediately contacted Peak44 customer service, and they responded the next morning. They provided a return shipping label and informed me that a replacement stock was being added to the build queue for expedited production.
Seven weeks later (the same amount of time as the original wait), I received the stock again. Upon inspection, it became clear that the stock had been repaired rather than replaced. It appeared that new material had been applied over the damaged area, and the original stock was sent back to me.
This was disappointing as I had been under the impression that I would be receiving a replacement stock, not a repaired one. The process took 14 weeks, and in the end, I received the same stock with a repair that could have likely been completed in a few days. I called customer service to express my concerns, and they reassured me that the stock would still be covered under warranty and replaced if it fails in the future.
While customer service has been responsive and assuring, I’m still hesitant to keep the stock since it doesn’t meet the expectations set by the original communication. There was no follow-up informing me that the stock would be repaired instead of replaced, and it almost seems like I’ve been sent back a repaired item to be passed off as new.
Has anyone else experienced a similar situation with Peak44, or do you have any advice on how to proceed? See attached photos of original vs repair.