Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is this some sort of catalog, or what?I haven’t seen this mentioned here yet. Anybody know if this is legit? The idea of an improved Fury 5000 with UHD glass sounds great. One can hope at least
View attachment 980521
Honestly not sure. Saw it posted on another forum. That’s why I was asking here if anyone had anymore info. I trust roksliders a bit more.
I can’t speak to UHd vs alpha glass. But I can’t say the glass is tremendously better than the Fury/Vipers.
To my eyes, superior to the SLC‘s. No field flattener like in the Maven B2’s and modern Swaro offerings, so also superior to all those options as well for my eyes (yes, that includes the NL’s). Definitely an Alpha performance grade optic. If Swaro had revamped the SLC’s to these and called them the SLC2.0, everybody would lump them into the “Swaro, Leica, Zeiss” bubble conversation. Top shelf optics, without question.What does the Vortex UHD glass compare to, say against Maven, Swaro?
Sent from my SM-S931U using Tapatalk
I wonder what these new binos will be priced at. Im still waiting on Maven to release theirs. Before I make a decision on RF Binos. Ad of now the Leica Geovids are first on my list.To my eyes, superior to the SLC‘s. No field flattener like in the Maven B2’s and modern Swaro offerings, so also superior to all those options as well for my eyes (yes, that includes the NL’s). Definitely an Alpha performance grade optic. If Swaro had revamped the SLC’s to these and called them the SLC2.0, everybody would lump them into the “Swaro, Leica, Zeiss” bubble conversation. Top shelf optics, without question.
Not sure if you've looked through them after that comment. I find them to be a touch more accurate than my 2 SLC's actually, and there's zero "pink" tint when looking through them. They are equally as sharp and contrasty as the SLC's as well.Clarity and resolution is one thing. They're all fairly close at the top.
I HATE the pink glass in Vortex UHDs. They have the worst color rendering of any major brand.
I know they say it helps with overall performance or whatever but I just can't stand to look through them.
I'm interested to see if they can pull off using their pink tint UHD glass in LRF binos though or if they'll use something else.
It dont! Never has never will. Closer to Nixon on comparison scale. Bushnell perhapsWhat does the Vortex UHD glass compare to, say against Maven, Swaro?
Sent from my SM-S931U using Tapatalk
I find them to be a touch more accurate than my 2 SLC's actually, and there's zero "pink" tint when looking through them.
Tell us you’ve never looked through a pair without actually saying saying you’ve never looked through a pair…It dont! Never has never will. Closer to Nixon on comparison scale. Bushnell perhaps
What about those of us who aren’t “older” people (barely crossed into my 30’s personally) who agree 110% with @JGRaider assessment?Yeah I hear this a lot from older people.
Vortex adds in the extra violet tint because as we age, our corneal lenses yellow which makes it harder to distinguish blue, green, and violet.
Old people spend the most money on binoculars, so Vortex adds in extra violet to their most expensive glass to make the green and brown easier to distinguish for people who are losing their color vision.
I can still see all my colors, so it looks awful.
What about those of us who aren’t “older” people (barely crossed into my 30’s personally) who agree 110% with @JGRaider assessment?
I’ve heard lots of people refer to Vortex glass as having a blue/green hue, but pink is a descriptor out of left field. Having compared multiple pairs of them in different configurations (10x42 & 50, 12x50) against NL’s, EL’s, and several pairs of Mavens in waning light and harsh conditions (glassing towards the setting sun with snow on the ground), the word “pink” would never have entered my vernacular under any circumstances.
How much time have you spent behind UHD’s and compared against the competition?
EDIT TO ADD: My statement and subsequent question are legit a legit, not meant to be confrontational. With the exception of lots ignorant people, I’ve never heard anyone who spent any type of legit time behind UHD’s say anything close to what you’re saying, so I’m interested to hear your real life assessments is all.
Wow, Interesting. You are the only person I’ve ever heard describe the UHD as “pink” in any circle. Not saying you’re wrong, but it’s definitely odd based on my own assessments as well as a large constituent of people I’ve spent time with/spoken to. What I’ve always heard and experienced is as follows:I’ve spent quite a bit of time behind them but it only takes half a second to notice the unnatural pink hue they cast over everything (if your eyes can see it, I guess)
The longer you look through them, the less you notice it. But even compared to much lower-quality glass, the colors appear brighter, but less natural.
Granted, no two people see colors the same, and 10% of men have some degree of colorblindness, but it’s very very obvious to me looking through the razor uhd glass that every green or blue has more violet than it does in real life.
This is a common thing though, I’m not very original.
Vortex UHD is pink
Zeiss is blue
Leica and Swaro are yellow
Kowa is green