New Mexico public draw

and the slimy person pushing this for the past 4 years with hidden agendas sure doesn’t help

And just who is your make believe boogeyman supposed to be?

There was a New Mexico resident who posted about the unfair non-resident preference on “the other hunting forum” that was some years ago. He was “blasted” over there by some non-residents who were obviously e-plus tag brokers and hunt club members. He left in disgust. I tried to get ahold of him but failed. He did appear here on this forum a while ago. He posted once about the subject and left. Can’t say I blame him given all of the trolls and gaslighters like you.

No one ever talks about how resident landowners can be outfitters with no regulation. The entire big game tag system is rigged by outfitters. If you are looking for a real boogeyman, you need to look no further than our own game commission. The chairman of the game commission is the elite hunt club manager for Trout Stalker Ranch. Once the election is over and the selection committee goes to work then maybe Mr. Stump will get his walking papers. At least I hope so.
 
I’ll humor you, you’ll need to be more specific on what I’m a lieing about..

After that I’m out for a while.
You forged Alison Fox’s signature on a fraudulent cash receipt on my behalf. The moderator deleted it. Remember? Don’t let the door hit you in the backside….
 
4% more tags makes it worse? Only if you’re an outfitter

The math has been explained a couple times on here in more detail.

short version for you- those applying in the guide pool will pour into the nr pool increasing the number of nr’s applying. which offsets any gains on made in allotment.

also keep in mind that the number of actual unit wide lo tags is considerably smaller than ro version of these so it’s not like a bounty of tags will be placed in the pool.

nr odds will almost certainly decrease in most units.



also wanted to note something about guides

I don’t use guides but I also think they can add great value to states when the system is working correctly.

new mexico sadly has very limited warden supervision and eyes in the field. pretty much anyone who has spent time in the woods there has story of theft, poaching, trucks driving through roadless areas, etc.

I would be all for having better oversight on the guide industry there from NM Game and Fish to get some eyes on herd health, habitat, and rampant violations.

The one guide issue that really bothers me is the two day rule. Basically guides using there umbrella to allow folks to apply with them to increase odds and get not require bare minimum services. It’s not outfitting by any stretch and should go.
 
And just who is your make believe boogeyman supposed to be?

There was a New Mexico resident who posted about the unfair non-resident preference on “the other hunting forum” that was some years ago. He was “blasted” over there by some non-residents who were obviously e-plus tag brokers and hunt club members. He left in disgust. I tried to get ahold of him but failed. He did appear here on this forum a while ago. He posted once about the subject and left. Can’t say I blame him given all of the trolls and gaslighters like you.

No one ever talks about how resident landowners can be outfitters with no regulation. The entire big game tag system is rigged by outfitters. If you are looking for a real boogeyman, you need to look no further than our own game commission. The chairman of the game commission is the elite hunt club manager for Trout Stalker Ranch. Once the election is over and the selection committee goes to work then maybe Mr. Stump will get his walking papers. At least I hope so.

You using the term gaslighting is pretty funny.
 
4% more tags makes it worse? Only if you’re an outfitter
I don’t think you understand the math here…

4% more tags in the NR pool doesn’t mean more tags for the same number of applicants. It means that almost everyone that put in for the outfitter pool will now join into the NR pool, with the most likely effect being that your odds in the NR pool will be reduced significantly, despite now accounting for 10% of total tags.
 
You forged Alison Fox’s signature on a fraudulent cash receipt on my behalf. The moderator deleted it. Remember? Don’t let the door hit you in the backside….

They were deleted because it was considered bullying, not because they were forged.

Yes I clarified this with the mods who did it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I don’t think you understand the math here…

4% more tags in the NR pool doesn’t mean more tags for the same number of applicants. It means that almost everyone that put in for the outfitter pool will now join into the NR pool, with the most likely effect being that your odds in the NR pool will be reduced significantly, despite now accounting for 10% of total tags.
I really just wanted to be a part of this 😂 I’m not worried about my 2.5% going to 2% if it provides entertainment
 
4% more tags makes it worse? Only if you’re an outfitter
You have to understand that the guide pool of %10 breaks down into %9 nonresident, and %1 resident.

The only way in theory, it could get better by removing the guide pool and going to 90/10 is if the non-resident applicants in the guide pool quit applying altogether. There is zero reason anyone would quit applying if the guide pool went away. You can still hunt with a guide if you drew in either pool.

Go back and look at post 41 if you want to see the numbers breakdown.
 
Too bad there’s wasn’t an option to scroll by or ignore a user or users..

Which I should do to honestly..

Thanks for the reality check.


There is an option to ignore a user. Hover over their username, then select "Ignore".

See screenshot below.


1777765641359.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: WRO
Back
Top