Bubblehide
WKR
- Joined
- May 13, 2015
- Messages
- 3,881
I'm positive it was. I have not reconfirmed in a long time. Thus the, last time I looked.Are you sure it’s defined in statute?
I'm positive it was. I have not reconfirmed in a long time. Thus the, last time I looked.Are you sure it’s defined in statute?
Curious what state this is in. I’m not aware of any statutes in the states I’ve lived in that define right of way on single lane roads.I'm positive it was. I have not reconfirmed in a long time. Thus the, last time I looked.
Did a quick google, the only thing in law in CO is "In Colorado, the statute regarding right of way on a single lane road is Colorado Revised Statutes Section 42-4-1007 which states that a vehicle should be driven entirely within a single lane and not moved from that lane unless it can be done safely; essentially meaning that on a single lane road, the vehicle already occupying the lane has the right of way unless it is safe to move over."Curious what state this is in. I’m not aware of any statutes in the states I’ve lived in that define right of way on single lane roads.
Not at all. Opposing directions, each fully occupying the lane….Doesn't really clear anything up.
I live 12 miles of a heavily recreated road that has lots of rocks. Cant tell you how many times someone has gone flying by me doing 50 mph plus slinging rocks at my windshields, very frustrating. I am not saying don't speed but when you see another vehicle slow down.Another little tid bit...On roads with rocks, wide enough for two vehicles, slow down so you don't fling rocks at the oncoming vehicle...
Lol, it sure doesn’t. Typicall Colorado statute that has too much discretion or exceptions that it shouldn’t even exist.Did a quick google, the only thing in law in CO is "In Colorado, the statute regarding right of way on a single lane road is Colorado Revised Statutes Section 42-4-1007 which states that a vehicle should be driven entirely within a single lane and not moved from that lane unless it can be done safely; essentially meaning that on a single lane road, the vehicle already occupying the lane has the right of way unless it is safe to move over."
Doesn't really clear anything up.
Agreed, I feel like a simple CO solution would be signage on trails. Like a simple "uphill traffic has the right of way" could go a long way at the start of the trail. Personally, I have not had a bad interaction, and most folks seem to get it, but there are obviously many more who definitely don't get it hahaLol, it sure doesn’t. Typicall Colorado statute that has too much discretion or exceptions that it shouldn’t even exist.