A three hour backpack trip that puts us within an easy morning stroll of two days of hunting, is a tradeoff I'll be willing to make, if needed, when we get there and see things that I cannot possible see and know until about October 11-12-13 at best.
I'm not planning a trip that hinges on backpacking deep into the wilderness. I'm planning a trip that'll hinge on a whole bunch of factors (the weather before we get there and what's forecasted while we are there and what we find in our days of scouting closer to the road and how glass-able certain spots prove to be) and we may never set foot in a wilderness, but I do see it as likely and not even the 'worst case'. I think my daughter can probably handle a wilderness hunt with all of the associated work spread out over a day of getting there, a couple days of hunting, and a day out, better than she can handle getting up in the middle of the night to climb mountains in the dark then climb back down a different mountain after dark then getting up to do it again several days in a row. If we actually kill something we have to either get it to a trail by ourselves (for the packers to retrieve) or a road by ourselves. It's work either way. I'm not going into this with a commitment to 'go deep'. I'm going into this committed to doing whatever I believe gives us the best odds when we get there, and 'going deep' requires a lot of advanced preparation whereas truck camping is easier in some ways but absolutely brutal if we shoot something in a steep nasty canyon that's 'only' a mile from the road.
I can't plan to truck camp then change my mind at the last minute and safely hike six miles into a wilderness. But I *can* plan to be in the wilderness then switch to a truck hunt at the last minute.
Also - the worry about 'what if you get there and there's no elk?' sort of depends on the notion that there's a 10,000 acre block of good elk habitat that's going to be empty. I'm sure that's possible but I'm not sure it's likely.