- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 15,116
Isn't it? The quote I replied to was in reply to a comment saying that the 300wsm might be more efficient in a shorter barrel.
It was mentioned the 300WSM could be more efficient in a short barrel which the above would all contribute.
Efficient meaning "achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort or expense."
Powder and recoil being the expense.
I would say the extra powder in the 300WM giving very marginal gains would make the argument its more efficient by definition as is the case with many smaller cases ie 6ARC vs 6GT vs 6Creed vs 6UM representing modest improvements via significant powder additions.
If that is what you meant, or that poster meant- ok. But that is across the board- a 308 is more “efficient” than the 300wsm. A 300 blackout is more “efficient” than the 308. Etc, etc. By that logic, the 22LR is more “efficient” than all of them.
But that is not what is generally meant when having this discussion. What people generally mean and believe is something akin to- there is a 100fps MV difference between a 300wsm and a 300wm in 26” barrels. However in 20” barrels there is only a 50fps difference in MV- I.E., the 300wsm is more “efficient” in shorter barrels. That is a myth. The 300wm maintains its on average 100fps higher MV over the 300wsm at all practical barrel lengths.