longspeak74
WKR
I had a Passat wagon, v6 all wheel drive at one time. Sleeper car...decent amount of room, good mileage and super quick.
Thank you for the reply, that's everything I want it to do as well...aside from the towing the boat. I'm not a big fan of the looks on the newer wagons, but they're still very tempting due to price and mileage on some of the 2010-2014s i've been seeing around. The emissions on the newer diesels worries me, I may have to get over it.I owned a 2010 VW Jetta Wagon TDI with a 6 speed manual...
Yeah i'm going to keep my eyes open, they're pretty sparse but i'm hoping one pops up to at least go check out.I’d also suggest the Volvo. Have treated me well
I think all the options i've listed are going to be very similar to your experience. When I got out of the air force, I had to sell pretty much everything I owned in order to reverse stupid financial decisions and move out of CA. I bought a 2002 Jetta for $400, and had to replace A LOT of "little things", but basically every accessory or trim piece was broken or in some state of disrepair. The damn thing just ran though.My girlfriend owned a 2008 Subaru when we got together. It was great for the first few years, when it hit 110k things just started falling apart.
I like them. They're not hot rods by any stretch but I see plenty make is past 300k with few issues. Head gaskets aren't nearly as bad about failures as the 2.5L. They're leaky: rear main seals, valve cover gaskets and cam seals can all leak. Best defense is drive it often and change oil every 3k, conventional is what I would run but synthetic is fine(just don't run a longer interval). T-belt kit w/ water pump every 10/yr or 100k miles and keep oil in it.Whats your take on the 2.2L engines? My 95 legacy has one it, 119k miles on it.
On the subaru, I have seen one headgasket failure after replacement (2.5 with the newest FP gasket) at close to 200k after replacement (320k on car total). And it was overheated badly because of a leaky oem replacement water pump. The rest have outlasted the bottom end or the car. And we have lots of subarus around hereThe Subarus are simple and reliable but, yes, even if previously repaired the head gaskets will need to be re-replaced every 100-150k on the generation vehicles that suffer from failure. I know it's not a wagon but I'd be searching for a pre-2012 Honda CR-V with the 2.4L engine. In my experience they are one of the most cost-efficient, reliable vehicles ever made.
I haven't really found any correlation between allowing the car to warm up and less head gasket failures but that's also not a question I've been asking folks. Most consumers wouldn't admit to that anyway, rather blame the product(which is know to have the issue). I really only feel that driving pretty aggressively before the engine reaches operating temp would contribute to failure. I think horizontally-opposed cylinder engines innately suffer from head gasket and oil consumption issues due to that design......and gravity. Having said that, an engine would only benefit from a little warm-up time or even conservative throttle input until it hits operating temp.On the subaru, I have seen one headgasket failure after replacement (2.5 with the newest FP gasket) at close to 200k after replacement (320k on car total). And it was overheated badly because of a leaky oem replacement water pump. The rest have outlasted the bottom end or the car. And we have lots of subarus around here
Have you noticed that people who warm up their subaru get way more miles out of the head gaskets.?
I like the crv, but starting to see many of them consume lots of oil (more than the subaru.....)
@fmythThe Subaru headgasket issue is caused by the configuration of the cylinders. Nearly everyone but Subaru builds an inline 4 cylinder engine with vertical cylinders. Subaru uses the "boxer' design with 2 cylinders on each oposing side. The cylinders are horizontal which means the head gaskets are always wet even when the engine is not running. The water/coolant eventually breaks down the gasket material which eventually causes a coolant leak. The coolant leak can be internal or external but usually causes overheating and subsequently warped or cracked cylinder heads. Changing the head gaskets on an oposing cylinder overhead cam engine is a PITA and more than the average shade tree mechanic is willing to tackle on the weekend. Most shops bill 12 hours to do the job and most cars will need the heads resurfaced. While they have it apart you may as well change the water pump, belts and hoses. I'd guess that a big percentage of older Subarus you'll find listed for sale are being sold because the owner can't afford the $2500-3500 get the head gaskets replaced. My wife lovers her Subaru but when it runs out of warranty it will be traded for a new one.
That's excellent to hear, and i'm 99% sure that's the route i'm going. If I get stuck somewhere wishing I had all wheel drive or something, i'm sure that will be a rare occasion. Most of the spots I like to fish are paved/improved dirt road, then hike in from there. I want the mileage and range. The wagons seem pretty rare, and when they pop up they're spendy.FWIW-
I still own a 2002 MkIV Golf tdi, it has now 280k and it burns ZERO oil. Dead-ass reliable. Runs as good as new.
Not sure what the timing belt costs as an individual item when done by a shop. A timing belt kit is about $300 see here: Belt Kit. I have done them myself, you do need some special tools. I had a shop do it last time, when I had the entire Ft and Rr suspension rebuilt, did not have a line-item breakout on that labor.That's excellent to hear, and i'm 99% sure that's the route i'm going. If I get stuck somewhere wishing I had all wheel drive or something, i'm sure that will be a rare occasion. Most of the spots I like to fish are paved/improved dirt road, then hike in from there. I want the mileage and range. The wagons seem pretty rare, and when they pop up they're spendy.
What do you usually spend on the timing belt, or do you diy?